Michel Picard
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Speech and Hearing top 1%
- Signal Processing top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- John S. BradleyJ. S. BradleyHiroshi SatōJavier F. UrchueguíaSerge André GirardTony LerouxMarilène CourteauR.Y. Larocque
- Topics
- Noise Effects and Management (9 papers)Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (8 papers)Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (3 papers)
In The Last Decade
Michel Picard
18 papers receiving 555 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Cognitive Neuroscience 444
- Speech and Hearing 327
- Signal Processing 202
- Biomedical Engineering 119
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 78
Countries citing papers authored by Michel Picard
This map shows the geographic impact of Michel Picard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michel Picard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michel Picard more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michel Picard
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michel Picard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michel Picard. The network helps show where Michel Picard may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michel Picard
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michel Picard. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michel Picard based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michel Picard. Michel Picard is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | |
| 2 | 18 | |
| 3 | Characteristics of the noise, reverberation time and speech-to-noise ratio found in day-care centers | 5 |
| 4 | 203 | |
| 5 | Revisiting speech interference in classrooms. | 135 |
| 6 | 155 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | [Multivariate study of auditory perception using multi-electrode cochlear implants]. | 1 |
| 13 | [Clinical study of speech understanding in noise]. | 2 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | [Clinical trial of BOBCAT: 1st report on the reliability and validity of computerized pure-tone audiometry]. | 2 |
| 17 | Speech perception through FM auditory trainers in noise and reverberation. | 6 |
| 18 | 1 |
About Michel Picard
Michel Picard is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Cognitive Neuroscience and Sensory Systems, having authored 18 papers that have together received 598 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Noise Effects and Management (9 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (8 papers) and Acoustic Wave Phenomena Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Speech and Hearing (327 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (444 citations) and Signal Processing (202 citations). Michel Picard has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, France and Venezuela. Frequent co-authors include John S. Bradley, J. S. Bradley, Hiroshi Satō, Javier F. Urchueguía, Serge André Girard, Tony Leroux, Marilène Courteau, R.Y. Larocque, Michel Lavoie and Marc Simard. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, Journal of Sound and Vibration and International Journal of Audiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.