Michal Knapp
Impact in
- Insect Science top 2%
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control
- Insect and Pesticide Research
- Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
-
- Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Papers in
-
- Insect-Plant Interactions and Control 16
- Insect and Pesticide Research 11
- Ecology 24
- Physiological and biochemical adaptations 10
- Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies 9
- Forest Insect Ecology and Management 7
- Co-authors
- Jana Knappová (8 shared papers)Milan Řezáč (2 shared papers)Oldřich Nedvěd (3 shared papers)Pavel Saska (6 shared papers)Ezequiel González (11 shared papers)Tomáš Kadlec (10 shared papers)Tiit Teder (4 shared papers)Jan Růžička (1 shared paper)
In The Last Decade
Michal Knapp
49 papers receiving 804 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 59
- Insect Science 412
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 264
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 342
- Ecological Modeling 75
- Ecology 281
Countries citing papers authored by Michal Knapp
This map shows the geographic impact of Michal Knapp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michal Knapp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michal Knapp more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michal Knapp
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michal Knapp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michal Knapp. The network helps show where Michal Knapp may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michal Knapp, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 50 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2015 | 74 | |
| 2 | 2013 | 59 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 39 | |
| 4 | 2013 | 37 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 34 | |
| 6 | 2013 | 31 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 29 | |
| 8 | 2018 | 27 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 27 | |
| 10 | 2020 | 24 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 23 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 23 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 21 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 21 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 20 | |
| 16 | 2021 | 19 | |
| 17 | 2016 | 19 | |
| 18 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 19 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 16 |
About Michal Knapp
Michal Knapp is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Genetics, having authored 50 papers that have together received 816 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect-Plant Interactions and Control (16 papers), Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies (15 papers), Plant and animal studies (14 papers), Insect and Pesticide Research (11 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (10 papers), Animal Ecology and Behavior Studies (9 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (8 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (412 citations), Nature and Landscape Conservation (264 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (342 citations), Ecological Modeling (75 citations) and Ecology (281 citations). Michal Knapp has collaborated with scholars based in Czechia, Argentina and Estonia. Frequent co-authors include Jana Knappová, Milan Řezáč, Oldřich Nedvěd, Pavel Saska, Ezequiel González, Tomáš Kadlec, Tiit Teder, Jan Růžička, Zuzana Münzbergová and Graciela Valladares. Their work appears in journals such as Biological Conservation, Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment, PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Physiological Entomology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.