Michael X. Chen

1.5k citations
58 papers · 1.2k · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Michael X. Chen

57 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers

Michael X. Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 324
  • Nephrology 50
  • Biological Psychiatry 13
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 28
  • Neurology 76
Replace Paul Spiers with:
Paul Spiers United Kingdom
Ting Li China
Christopher Lotz Germany
James V. Winkler United States
Ester Zylber‐Katz Israel
Furong Zhang China
Martin Wepler Germany
Jinyi Li China
Jana Zapletalová Czechia
Michael X. Chen relative to Paul Spiers United Kingdom Paul Spiers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×4×4.8×
Paul Spiers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael X. Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael X. Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael X. Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael X. Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael X. Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael X. Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael X. Chen. The network helps show where Michael X. Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael X. Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael X. Chen Line = papers co-authored together Michael X. Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 58 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2018153
2 2015144
3 201697
4 202089
5 200984
6 201276
7 200765
8 202038
9 201729
10 202028
11 200025
12 202421
13 202020
14 202320
15 201718
16 202317
17 201016
18 201516
19 202013
20 202012

About Michael X. Chen

Michael X. Chen is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Hematology, Spectroscopy, Immunology and Statistics and Probability, having authored 58 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (7 papers), Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes (5 papers), Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments (5 papers), Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Iron Metabolism and Disorders (3 papers), Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (3 papers), Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications (3 papers) and Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (324 citations), Nephrology (50 citations), Biological Psychiatry (13 citations), Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (28 citations) and Neurology (76 citations). Michael X. Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include I‐Lin Tsai, San‐Yuan Wang, Ching‐Hua Kuo, Demetrius Klee Lopes, Daniel Louis Jacoby, Veena S. Rao, Wai Hong Wilson Tang, Francis Perry Wilson, Frank J. Vocci and Katherine L. Beebe. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Cardiac Failure, Clinical Biochemistry, Blood, Journal of Visualized Experiments and Journal of Chromatography A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact