Michael Wu

1.6k total citations
7 papers, 103 citations indexed

About

Michael Wu is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, General Health Professions and Emergency Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael Wu has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 103 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, 2 papers in General Health Professions and 2 papers in Emergency Medicine. Recurrent topics in Michael Wu's work include Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (2 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (1 paper). Michael Wu is often cited by papers focused on Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (2 papers), Patient Safety and Medication Errors (2 papers) and Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (1 paper). Michael Wu collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Croatia. Michael Wu's co-authors include Sylvain Boet, Cole Etherington, Sarah Larrigan, Mark Walker, Jennifer H. Tang, James J. Jung, Henry Liu, Katrina Sullivan, Feng‐Jen Tsai and Tina Poklepović Peričić and has published in prestigious journals such as American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, BMJ Open and BMJ Quality & Safety.

In The Last Decade

Michael Wu

7 papers receiving 98 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Michael Wu Canada	4	37	31	28	21	20	7	103
Anne‐Laure Philippon France	7	20 0.5×	32 1.0×	36 1.3×	27 1.3×	32 1.6×	27	153
Eugène Tuyishime Rwanda	6	17 0.5×	19 0.6×	33 1.2×	18 0.9×	35 1.8×	27	119
Tahereh Alinia Iran	8	23 0.6×	38 1.2×	17 0.6×	8 0.4×	26 1.3×	21	167
Joana Pereira Sousa Portugal	7	20 0.5×	31 1.0×	12 0.4×	18 0.9×	10 0.5×	25	102
Anil Hormis United Kingdom	4	21 0.6×	11 0.4×	12 0.4×	9 0.4×	32 1.6×	6	67
Graham R. Nimmo United Kingdom	6	29 0.8×	11 0.4×	33 1.2×	8 0.4×	47 2.4×	12	171
Marc Sørensen Denmark	8	12 0.3×	20 0.6×	27 1.0×	9 0.4×	20 1.0×	15	137
Susan DeSousa Canada	5	48 1.3×	20 0.6×	67 2.4×	13 0.6×	103 5.2×	6	166
Beth Lilja Denmark	5	84 2.3×	30 1.0×	25 0.9×	12 0.6×	25 1.3×	5	158
Gayathri Karthikeyan India	4	18 0.5×	24 0.8×	37 1.3×	20 1.0×	4 0.2×	8	245

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Wu

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Wu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Wu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Wu more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Wu

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Wu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Wu. The network helps show where Michael Wu may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Wu

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Wu. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Wu based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Wu. Michael Wu is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Wu, Michael, Alvin Leenus, M. Bhandari, et al.. (2023). Measures of Retention in HIV Care: A Study Within a Review. AIDS Patient Care and STDs. 37(4). 192–198. 3 indexed citations

2.

Wang, Ying, Tina Poklepović Peričić, Geertruida E Bekkering, et al.. (2023). How do network meta-analyses address intransitivity when assessing certainty of evidence: a systematic survey. BMJ Open. 13(11). e075212–e075212. 1 indexed citations

3.

Etherington, Cole, Michael Wu, & Sylvain Boet. (2020). Sex/gender and additional equity characteristics of providers and patients in perioperative anesthesia trials: a cross-sectional analysis of the literature. Korean journal of anesthesiology. 74(1). 6–14. 3 indexed citations

4.

Tsai, Feng‐Jen, et al.. (2020). Does a Free-Trial Approach Increase Purchase and Use of a Household Water Treatment and Safe Storage Product in Rural Haiti?. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 102(3). 518–525. 5 indexed citations

5.

Etherington, Cole, Sarah Larrigan, Henry Liu, et al.. (2019). Measuring the teamwork performance of operating room teams: a systematic review of assessment tools and their measurement properties. Journal of Interprofessional Care. 35(1). 37–45. 17 indexed citations

6.

Etherington, Cole, et al.. (2019). Interprofessional communication in the operating room: a narrative review to advance research and practice. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie. 66(10). 1251–1260. 57 indexed citations

7.

Wu, Michael, Jennifer H. Tang, Cole Etherington, Mark Walker, & Sylvain Boet. (2019). Interventions for improving teamwork in intrapartum care: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ Quality & Safety. 29(1). 77–85. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact