Michael Wierzbicki

2.1k citations
37 papers · 1.6k indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 15

Michael Wierzbicki

36 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

A meta-analysis of psychotherapy dropout.8251993202620042015250500750

Peers

Michael Wierzbicki
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Clinical Psychology 1.1k
  • Applied Psychology 204
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 326
  • Social Psychology 485
  • Safety Research 172
Replace Anna M. Kokotovic with:
Anna M. Kokotovic United States
Holly Barrett Waldron United States
Eileen A. McConnaughy United States
Philip A. Saigh United States
Laura L. Humphrey United States
Lynne Siqueland United States
Bruce S. Liese United States
Gary R. Birchler United States
Oliver Lindhiem United States
Alfred S. Friedman United States
Michael Wierzbicki relative to Anna M. Kokotovic United States Anna M. Kokotovic's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Anna M. Kokotovic · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Wierzbicki

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Wierzbicki's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Wierzbicki with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Wierzbicki more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Wierzbicki

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Wierzbicki. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Wierzbicki. The network helps show where Michael Wierzbicki may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Michael Wierzbicki, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Wierzbicki Line = papers co-authored together Michael Wierzbicki links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
A Summary of Evaluations for Learning and Attention Problems at a University Training Clinic.
20074
2 200341
3 19984
4 19971
5 19942
6 19931
7 19932
8 1993132
9 19936
10 19915
11 199015
12 19896
13 198914
14 198912
15 198750
16 19872
17 198668
18 19868
19 198547
20 198434

About Michael Wierzbicki

Michael Wierzbicki is a scholar working on General Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 37 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (16 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (8 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (7 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (5 papers), Behavioral and Psychological Studies (3 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (3 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (3 papers) and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations), Applied Psychology (204 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (326 citations). Michael Wierzbicki has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Gene Pekarik, Richard David Young, Ronald G. Evans, Kathleen McHugh, Mark W. Driscoll and Eric L. Daleiden. Their work appears in journals such as Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Addictive Behaviors and Journal of Clinical Psychology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026