Michaël Tilby
Impact in
- Museology top 10%
- Historical Art and Culture Studies
-
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Literature and Culture Studies 10
- Historical and Literary Analyses 8
- French Literature and Criticism 6
- French Literature and Critical Theory 5
- French Literature and Poetry 5
-
- Historical and Literary Studies 9
- Co-authors
- Janell Watson (1 shared paper)Thomas Starkey (2 shared papers)Lennard Y. W. Lee (3 shared papers)E.M. Fielden (1 shared paper)Celia Britton (1 shared paper)David J. Pinato (1 shared paper)Sarah Williams (1 shared paper)Grisma Patel (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- French Studies (18 papers)The Modern Language Review (10 papers)British Journal of Cancer (2 papers)Annals of Oncology (2 papers)Neophilologus (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomItalyLebanon
In The Last Decade
Michaël Tilby
25 papers receiving 74 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
- Museology 13
- History and Philosophy of Science 13
- Literature and Literary Theory 25
- History 14
- Conservation 4
Countries citing papers authored by Michaël Tilby
This map shows the geographic impact of Michaël Tilby's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michaël Tilby with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michaël Tilby more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michaël Tilby
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michaël Tilby. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michaël Tilby. The network helps show where Michaël Tilby may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michaël Tilby, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 14 | |
| 2 | 2007 | 13 | |
| 3 | 2002 | 11 | |
| 4 | 1982 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2009 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 7 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1991 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1998 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2002 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2021 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2015 | 1 |
About Michaël Tilby
Michaël Tilby is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Anthropology, Oncology, Philosophy and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 42 papers that have together received 96 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Literature and Culture Studies (10 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (9 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (8 papers), French Literature and Criticism (6 papers), French Literature and Critical Theory (5 papers), French Literature and Poetry (5 papers), Linguistics and Discourse Analysis (4 papers) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Museology (13 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (13 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (25 citations), History (14 citations) and Conservation (4 citations). Michaël Tilby has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Lebanon. Frequent co-authors include Janell Watson, Thomas Starkey, Lennard Y. W. Lee, E.M. Fielden, Celia Britton, David J. Pinato, Sarah Williams, Grisma Patel, Emma Burke and James J. Clark. Their work appears in journals such as French Studies, The Modern Language Review, British Journal of Cancer, Annals of Oncology and Neophilologus.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.