Michael Stoll

1.8k citations
56 papers · 665 · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Stoll

52 papers receiving 588 citations

Peers

Michael Stoll
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Geometry and Topology 574
  • Algebra and Number Theory 192
  • Mathematical Physics 303
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 75
  • Theoretical Computer Science 18
Replace Michael A. Bennett with:
Michael A. Bennett Canada
Gisbert Wüstholz Switzerland
B.M.M. de Weger Netherlands
José Felipe Voloch United States
M. Ram Murty Canada
Jürgen Klüners Germany
Alice Silverberg United States
Edward F. Schaefer United States
Jan‐Hendrik Evertse Netherlands
Hans Peter Schlickewei Germany
Michael Stoll relative to Michael A. Bennett Canada Michael A. Bennett's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Michael A. Bennett · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Stoll

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Stoll's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Stoll with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Stoll more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Stoll

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Stoll. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Stoll. The network helps show where Michael Stoll may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Stoll, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Stoll Line = papers co-authored together Michael Stoll links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 56 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199978
2 200160
3 200738
4 200335
5 200832
6 200931
7 200229
8 199228
9 200127
10 200823
11 201021
12 200820
13 200819
14 199618
15 199917
16 200213
17 199812
18 200312
19 200212
20 200910

About Michael Stoll

Michael Stoll is a scholar working on Geometry and Topology, Mathematical Physics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Information Systems and Algebra and Number Theory, having authored 56 papers that have together received 665 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Algebraic Geometry and Number Theory (40 papers), Advanced Algebra and Geometry (16 papers), Polynomial and algebraic computation (15 papers), Geometric and Algebraic Topology (12 papers), Cryptography and Residue Arithmetic (9 papers), Coding theory and cryptography (6 papers), Analytic Number Theory Research (6 papers) and Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geometry and Topology (574 citations), Algebra and Number Theory (192 citations), Mathematical Physics (303 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (75 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (18 citations). Michael Stoll has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Bjorn Poonen, Nils Bruin, J. E. Cremona, Edward F. Schaefer, Tom Fisher, Samir Siksek, Yann Bugeaud, William Stein, Maurice Mignotte and Franck Leprévost. Their work appears in journals such as Mathematics of Computation, Acta Arithmetica, Journal für die reine und angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal), Algebra & Number Theory and Journal of the London Mathematical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact