Michael Shank
Impact in
-
- Historical Philosophy and Science
- Space and Planetary Science top 10%
Papers in
-
- History of Science and Medicine 6
- Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies 3
- Historical Philosophy and Science 3
- History of Science and Natural History 3
-
- Historical Astronomy and Related Studies 8
- Co-authors
- Clive Ruggles (1 shared paper)Lisa Schirch (1 shared paper)George Saliba (1 shared paper)Edward Maibach (1 shared paper)Sara Cobb (1 shared paper)K. M. Cobb (1 shared paper)Anthony Leiserowitz (1 shared paper)Jay Gulledge (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (4 papers)Early Science and Medicine (4 papers)Isis (4 papers)Signs (1 paper)Exemplaria (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomCanada
In The Last Decade
Michael Shank
31 papers receiving 261 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 79
- History and Philosophy of Science 45
- Space and Planetary Science 12
- Archeology 80
- Paleontology 56
- Archeology 7
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Shank
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Shank's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Shank with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Shank more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Shank
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Shank. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Shank. The network helps show where Michael Shank may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Michael Shank, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 40 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 97 | |
| 2 | 2008 | 50 | |
| 3 | 2012 | 43 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 16 | |
| 5 | 1985 | 9 | |
| 6 | 1997 | 9 | |
| 7 | 1998 | 8 | |
| 8 | 1992 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2013 | 6 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 6 | |
| 11 | Redefining the Movement: Art Activism | 2004 | 5 |
| 12 | 2007 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2011 | 5 | |
| 14 | 1990 | 4 | |
| 15 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 16 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 17 | 1996 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 3 | |
| 19 | 2013 | 3 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 3 |
About Michael Shank
Michael Shank is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Anthropology, Archeology and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 40 papers that have together received 311 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical Astronomy and Related Studies (8 papers), History of Science and Medicine (6 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (4 papers), Historical and Architectural Studies (3 papers), Diverse Historical and Scientific Studies (3 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (3 papers), Historical Philosophy and Science (3 papers) and History of Science and Natural History (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (45 citations), Space and Planetary Science (12 citations), Archeology (80 citations), Paleontology (56 citations) and Archeology (7 citations). Michael Shank has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Clive Ruggles, Lisa Schirch, George Saliba, Edward Maibach, Sara Cobb, K. M. Cobb, Anthony Leiserowitz, Jay Gulledge, David C. Lindberg and Ronald L. Numbers. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Early Science and Medicine, Isis, Signs and Exemplaria.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.