Michael Sacherer

1.3k citations
14 papers · 962 · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Sacherer

14 papers receiving 954 citations

Peers

Michael Sacherer
Comparison fields: 5 of 86
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 311
  • Nephrology 87
  • Cancer Research 114
  • Molecular Biology 403
  • Biomedical Engineering 217
Replace Oana Sorop with:
Oana Sorop Netherlands
Bettina Reglin Germany
Toshiyuki Noda Japan
Qijun Zheng China
Hiroki Ito Japan
Carsten Wunderlich Germany
Gerardus P. J. van Hout Netherlands
Shinichi Iwata Japan
Eiji Toyota Japan
Hiroaki Sato Japan
Michael Sacherer relative to Oana Sorop Netherlands Oana Sorop's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Oana Sorop · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Sacherer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Sacherer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Sacherer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Sacherer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Sacherer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Sacherer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Sacherer. The network helps show where Michael Sacherer may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Sacherer, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Sacherer Line = papers co-authored together Michael Sacherer links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 2019248
2 2015211
3 2018131
4 201570
5 201463
6 201756
7 201346
8 201245
9 201138
10 201932
11 201818
12 20232
13 20241
14 20111

About Michael Sacherer

Michael Sacherer is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, Nephrology and Pharmacology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 962 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (3 papers), Elasticity and Material Modeling (3 papers), Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (1 paper), Ion Transport and Channel Regulation (1 paper), Ion channel regulation and function (1 paper), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (1 paper), Acute Myocardial Infarction Research (1 paper) and Dermatological and Skeletal Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (311 citations), Nephrology (87 citations), Cancer Research (114 citations), Molecular Biology (403 citations) and Biomedical Engineering (217 citations). Michael Sacherer has collaborated with scholars based in Austria, Germany and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Christian Viertler, Gerhard Sommer, Gerhard A. Holzapfel, Michaela Andrä, Heimo Wolinski, Andreas Jörg Schriefl, Burkert Pieske, Dirk von Lewinski, André Renner and Markus T. Bohnsack. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Medicine, Circulation Research, Circulation, European Journal of Heart Failure and Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact