Michael R. Nash
Impact in
- General Psychology top 0.5%
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Memory Processes and Influences
Papers in
-
- Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology 19
-
- Pain Management and Placebo Effect 50
- Mind wandering and attention 11
- Co-authors
- Christopher HeapsJeffrey J. BorckardtTimothy L. HulseyAmanda J. BarnierWarren LambertMark C. SextonTina L. HarralsonSteven Jay Lynn
- Journals
- International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis (28 papers)Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology (6 papers)Psychological Assessment (5 papers)Otolaryngology (5 papers)American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsraelAustralia
In The Last Decade
Michael R. Nash
124 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 142
- General Psychology 223
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.2k
- Clinical Psychology 1.1k
- Applied Psychology 230
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 376
Countries citing papers authored by Michael R. Nash
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael R. Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael R. Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael R. Nash more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael R. Nash
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael R. Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael R. Nash. The network helps show where Michael R. Nash may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael R. Nash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 26 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2006 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2006 | 14 | |
| 8 | 2005 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2005 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 18 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 17 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 32 | |
| 14 | 2002 | 18 | |
| 15 | 2001 | 35 | |
| 16 | 1998 | 25 | |
| 17 | 1996 | 42 | |
| 18 | 1995 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1994 | 19 | |
| 20 | Reply to Comment by Briere and Elliott | 1993 | 13 |
About Michael R. Nash
Michael R. Nash is a scholar working on General Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Microbiology, having authored 131 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pain Management and Placebo Effect (50 papers), Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology (19 papers), Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (18 papers), Mind wandering and attention (11 papers), Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (9 papers), Child Abuse and Trauma (8 papers), Pediatric Pain Management Techniques (7 papers) and Psychological Testing and Assessment (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (223 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.2k citations), Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations), Applied Psychology (230 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (376 citations). Michael R. Nash has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Christopher Heaps, Jeffrey J. Borckardt, Timothy L. Hulsey, Amanda J. Barnier, Warren Lambert, Mark C. Sexton, Tina L. Harralson, Steven Jay Lynn, Darlene Shaw and Martin D. Murphy. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Hypnosis, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, Psychological Assessment, Otolaryngology and American Journal of Clinical Hypnosis.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.