Michael O’Shea

8.2k citations
130 papers · 6.0k indexed · h-index 42

Michael O’Shea

126 papers receiving 5.8k citations

Peers

Michael O’Shea
Comparison fields: 5 of 167
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 3.7k
  • Insect Science 815
  • Aging 111
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 342
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 783
Replace J. Douglas Armstrong with:
J. Douglas Armstrong United Kingdom
Eric A. Stone United States
Ann‐Shyn Chiang Taiwan
Edward A. Kravitz United States
Naweed I. Syed Canada
K Kirschfeld Germany
Gero Miesenböck United States
R. Meldrum Robertson Canada
Erno Vreugdenhil Netherlands
Stefan R. Pulver United States
Michael O’Shea relative to J. Douglas Armstrong United Kingdom J. Douglas Armstrong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
J. Douglas Armstrong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael O’Shea

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael O’Shea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael O’Shea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael O’Shea more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael O’Shea

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael O’Shea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael O’Shea. The network helps show where Michael O’Shea may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael O’Shea, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael O’Shea Line = papers co-authored together Michael O’Shea links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20251
2 20250
3 20217
4 201330
5 20109
6 200917
7 20097
8 200840
9 200849
10 200534
11 200541
12 200439
13 200351
14 200245
15 199895
16 199423
17 19943
18 199315
19 198931
20 198942

About Michael O’Shea

Michael O’Shea is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Insect Science and Microbiology, having authored 130 papers that have together received 6.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (64 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (23 papers), Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (14 papers), Physiological and biochemical adaptations (12 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (11 papers), Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (10 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (10 papers) and Photoreceptor and optogenetics research (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (3.7k citations), Insect Science (815 citations), Aging (111 citations), Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (342 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (783 citations). Michael O’Shea has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Peter D. Evans, Michael E. Adams, Sergei A. Korneev, Maurice R. Elphick, Paul R. Benjamin, C. H. F. Rowell, György Kemenes, Ji Ho Park, Phil Husbands and Ildikó Kemenes. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Journal of Experimental Biology, European Journal of Neuroscience, Current Biology and Journal of Comparative Physiology A.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026