Michael Nathan

789 citations
15 papers · 576 indexed · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Nathan

15 papers receiving 541 citations

Peers

Michael Nathan
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 118
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 116
  • Pharmacology 56
  • Clinical Psychology 111
  • Biochemistry 31
Replace Gilbert R. Kaats with:
Gilbert R. Kaats United States
R. Grossarth-Maticek Germany
Amy Locke United States
Christine Wade United States
M.L. Calcagno Argentina
E. Lehmann Germany
Dong-Seon Chang South Korea
Marian Reiff United States
Makio Iimori Japan
Sabrina Anne Jacob United Kingdom
Michael Nathan relative to Gilbert R. Kaats United States Gilbert R. Kaats's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.4×
Gilbert R. Kaats · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Nathan

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Nathan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Nathan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Nathan more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Nathan

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Nathan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Nathan. The network helps show where Michael Nathan may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Michael Nathan, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Nathan Line = papers co-authored together Michael Nathan links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 1999283
2 199554
3 200448
4 199547
5 199543
6 200631
7 198416
8 199515
9 19909
10 19938
11 20027
12 19875
13 19994
14 19993
15 19793

About Michael Nathan

Michael Nathan is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, General Health Professions and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 576 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (4 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (2 papers), Schizophrenia research and treatment (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Health (2 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (1 paper) and Innovations in Medical Education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (118 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (116 citations), Pharmacology (56 citations), Clinical Psychology (111 citations) and Biochemistry (31 citations). Michael Nathan has collaborated with scholars based in Israel and United States. Frequent co-authors include Sol Kugelmass, A. F. Mirsky, Ruth Guttman, Edward Frenkel, Mack Lipkin, Joseph Rabatin, Adina Kalet, Siv Fischbein, Valerie E. Stone and Elizabeth Miller. Their work appears in journals such as Schizophrenia Bulletin, Journal of General Internal Medicine, Annals of Internal Medicine, Culture Medicine and Psychiatry and Journal of Youth and Adolescence.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact