Michael Nash

534 citations
9 papers · 302 · h-index 7

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Nash

9 papers receiving 298 citations

Peers

Michael Nash
Comparison fields: 5 of 66
  • Structural Biology 7
  • Immunology 88
  • Oncology 61
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 73
  • Biological Psychiatry 4
Replace Meiling Wu with:
Meiling Wu Taiwan
Balázs Visegrády Hungary
Inge Reinieren-Beeren Netherlands
Rosalind A. Meldrum United Kingdom
Stephen A. Jannetti United States
Svava K. Wetzel Switzerland
Joseph D. Schonhoft United States
Ola B. Nilsson Sweden
Katalin Fejes Tóth Germany
Devdoot Majumdar United States
Michael Nash relative to Meiling Wu Taiwan Meiling Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Meiling Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Nash

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Nash's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Nash with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Nash more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Nash

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Nash. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Nash. The network helps show where Michael Nash may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Nash, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Nash Line = papers co-authored together Michael Nash links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

9 of 9 papers shown
#Work
1
Phase I study of intraperitoneal recombinant human interleukin 12 in patients with Müllerian carcinoma, gastrointestinal primary malignancies, and mesothelioma.
200271
2 200067
3 201765
4 199839
5 201535
6 201612
7 201411
8 19861
9 19871

About Michael Nash

Michael Nash is a scholar working on Molecular Biology, Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics, Immunology, Marketing and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 9 papers that have together received 302 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Force Microscopy Techniques and Applications (3 papers), Biochemical and Structural Characterization (2 papers), Immune Cell Function and Interaction (2 papers), American History and Culture (1 paper), T-cell and B-cell Immunology (1 paper), Lipid Membrane Structure and Behavior (1 paper), Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (1 paper) and Signaling Pathways in Disease (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Structural Biology (7 citations), Immunology (88 citations), Oncology (61 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (73 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (4 citations). Michael Nash has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Renato Lenzi, Ralph S. Freedman, Chris D. Platsoucas, Hermann E. Gaub, Wolfgang Ott, Markus Jobst, Lukas F. Milles, Bohuslav Melichar, Claire F. Verschraegen and Andrzej P. Kudelka. Their work appears in journals such as Clinical & Experimental Immunology, Physical review. E, ACS Nano, Analytical Chemistry and The Business History Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact