Countries citing papers authored by Michael Meuser
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Meuser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Meuser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Meuser more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Meuser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Meuser. The network helps show where Michael Meuser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Meuser
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Meuser.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Meuser based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Meuser. Michael Meuser is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hornbostel, Stefan, et al.. (2015). Merci (Monitoring European Research Council’s Implementation of Excellence): Evaluation Report on the Impact of the ERC Starting Grant Programme.2 indexed citations
2.
Lengersdorf, Diana & Michael Meuser. (2011). Karriereverläufe von Männern in unsicheren Zeiten. Hegemoniale Männlichkeit am Ende. PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University). 14.2 indexed citations
3.
Hornbostel, Stefan, et al.. (2008). Postdocs in Deutschland: Evaluation des Emmy Noether-Programms. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 3. 151.7 indexed citations
4.
Meuser, Michael. (2008). Ernste Spiele: zur Konstruktion von Männlichkeit im Wettbewerb der Männer. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 5171–5176.4 indexed citations
Bereswill, Mechthild, et al.. (2007). Dimensionen der Kategorie Geschlecht: Der Fall Männlichkeit.2 indexed citations
7.
Meuser, Michael. (2006). Gender-Management: zur Professionalisierung von Geschlechterpolitik. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 3202–3209.1 indexed citations
8.
Meuser, Michael. (2006). Vereinbarkeitsmanagement: Zuständigkeiten und Karrierechancen bei Doppelkarrierepaaren. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 4713–4722.4 indexed citations
9.
Meuser, Michael. (2006). Hegemoniale Männlichkeit : Überlegungen zur Leitkategorie der Men's Studies.6 indexed citations
10.
Meuser, Michael. (2004). Zwischen „Leibvergessenheit“ und „Körperboom“. Die Soziologie und der Körper. Sport und Gesellschaft. 1(3).3 indexed citations
Meuser, Michael, et al.. (2003). Vereinbarkeitsmanagement. Die Herstellung von Gemeinschaft bei Doppelkarrierepaaren. Soziale Welt. 54(2). 163–174.8 indexed citations
Meuser, Michael & Ulrike Nagel. (1991). ExpertInneninterviews - vielfach erprobt, wenig bedacht: ein Beitrag zur qualitativen Methodendiskussion. Social Science Open Access Repository (GESIS – Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences). 6. 441–471.207 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.