Michael Laskin

1.7k citations
29 papers · 43 · h-index 4

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Laskin

18 papers receiving 40 citations

Peers

Michael Laskin
Comparison fields: 5 of 37
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 7
  • Finance 6
  • Development 2
  • Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics 1
  • Artificial Intelligence 10
Replace Julia Herbinger with:
Julia Herbinger Germany
María del Carmen Martel Escobar Spain
Florian Wilhelm Germany
Mohamed Chaouch France
Miodrag Lovrić Serbia
Stephen Luke United States
Louise A. Francis
Joan Ervin United States
Shamsuddeen Hassan Muhammad Nigeria
D. Zhang United States
Michael Laskin relative to Julia Herbinger Germany Julia Herbinger's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Julia Herbinger · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Laskin

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Laskin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Laskin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Laskin more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Laskin

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Laskin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Laskin. The network helps show where Michael Laskin may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Michael Laskin, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Laskin Line = papers co-authored together Michael Laskin links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 29 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 20217
2 20226
3 20235
4 20214
5 20203
6 19982
7 20172
8 20172
9 20161
10 20181
11 20221
12 20161
13 20151
14 20201
15
CURL: Contrastive Unsupervised Representation Learning for Reinforcement Learning
20201
16 20201
17 20201
18 20221
19 20181
20 20181

About Michael Laskin

Michael Laskin is a scholar working on Control and Systems Engineering, Management of Technology and Innovation, Transportation, Economics and Econometrics and Civil and Structural Engineering, having authored 29 papers that have together received 43 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic and Technological Systems Analysis (7 papers), Transportation Systems and Logistics (5 papers), Transportation Planning and Optimization (5 papers), Stochastic processes and financial applications (4 papers), Traffic control and management (4 papers), Reinforcement Learning in Robotics (3 papers), Urban Transport Systems Analysis (2 papers) and Environmental Sustainability and Technology (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (7 citations), Finance (6 citations), Development (2 citations), Discrete Mathematics and Combinatorics (1 citation) and Artificial Intelligence (10 citations). Michael Laskin has collaborated with scholars based in Russia, United States and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Pieter Abbeel, Lerrel Pinto, Kimin Lee, E. David Morgan, Ryan C. Moffet, Hao Liu, Jay M. Tomlin, Kevin Lü, Matthew Fraund and Ruihan Zhao. Their work appears in journals such as Aerosol Science and Technology, Value in Health, Mathematics, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and International Journal of Simulation and Process Modelling.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact