Michael L. Hecht

141 papers receiving 4.9k citations

Peers

Michael L. Hecht
Comparison fields: 5 of 144
  • Communication 764
  • Applied Psychology 415
  • Social Psychology 1.6k
  • Literature and Literary Theory 704
  • Clinical Psychology 1.1k
Replace Brant R. Burleson with:
Brant R. Burleson United States
Amado M. Padilla United States
Steve Duck United States
Kathryn Greene United States
Paula S. Nurius United States
Arjan E. R. Bos Netherlands
Victoria M. Esses Canada
Michael Burgoon United States
Sandra Petronio United States
Valerian J. Derlega United States
Michael L. Hecht relative to Brant R. Burleson United States Brant R. Burleson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
Brant R. Burleson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael L. Hecht

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael L. Hecht's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael L. Hecht with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael L. Hecht more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael L. Hecht

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael L. Hecht. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael L. Hecht. The network helps show where Michael L. Hecht may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael L. Hecht, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael L. Hecht Line = papers co-authored together Michael L. Hecht links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20232
2 20232
3 20223
4 20223
5 20209
6 20208
7 202015
8 201913
9 20188
10 201720
11 201526
12 201533
13 20132
14 201312
15 201220
16 201138
17
Barriers, control and identity in health information seeking among African American women
200916
18
The nonverbal communication reader : classic and contemporary readings
200847
19 200811
20 200716

About Michael L. Hecht

Michael L. Hecht is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Literature and Literary Theory, Communication, Social Psychology and Safety Research, having authored 143 papers that have together received 5.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Media Influence and Health (23 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (22 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (20 papers), Communication in Education and Healthcare (20 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (18 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (16 papers), Community Health and Development (15 papers) and Impact of Technology on Adolescents (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (764 citations), Applied Psychology (415 citations), Social Psychology (1.6k citations), Literature and Literary Theory (704 citations) and Clinical Psychology (1.1k citations). Michael L. Hecht has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Japan. Frequent co-authors include Eura Jung, Michelle Miller‐Day, Linda Larkey, Sidney A. Ribeau, Elvira Elek, Flavio F. Marsiglia, Stephen Kulis, Jennifer A. Kam, Brian H. Spitzberg and J. K. Alberts. Their work appears in journals such as Health Communication, Journal of Applied Communication Research, International Journal of Intercultural Relations, Prevention Science and Journal of Drug Education.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026