Michael L. Graesser
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 0.5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 2%
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics top 2%
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
- Mathematical Physics
- Co-authors
- Csaba CsákiJohn TerningGraham D. KribsChristopher KoldaKaustubh AgasheLisa RandallVincenzo CiriglianoIan M. Shoemaker
- Topics
- Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (31 papers)Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (25 papers)Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (23 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesNetherlandsFrance
In The Last Decade
Michael L. Graesser
46 papers receiving 2.4k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 2.4k
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 1.5k
- Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 335
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 148
- Mathematical Physics 33
Countries citing papers authored by Michael L. Graesser
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael L. Graesser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael L. Graesser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael L. Graesser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael L. Graesser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael L. Graesser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael L. Graesser. The network helps show where Michael L. Graesser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael L. Graesser
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael L. Graesser. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael L. Graesser based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael L. Graesser. Michael L. Graesser is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Discerning supersymmetry in adjacent branch cascade decay correlations | 0 |
| 2 | 11 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 109 | |
| 8 | 30 | |
| 9 | WIMP-nucleus scattering in chiral effective theory | 23 |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | 37 | |
| 12 | 131 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 16 | |
| 16 | 44 | |
| 17 | 275 | |
| 18 | 31 | |
| 19 | 16 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Michael L. Graesser
Michael L. Graesser is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, having authored 47 papers that have together received 2.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (31 papers), Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (25 papers) and Black Holes and Theoretical Physics (23 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (2.4k citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (1.5k citations) and Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (335 citations). Michael L. Graesser has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and France. Frequent co-authors include Csaba Csáki, John Terning, Graham D. Kribs, Christopher Kolda, Kaustubh Agashe, Lisa Randall, Vincenzo Cirigliano, Ian M. Shoemaker, Luca Vecchi and Wouter Dekens. Their work appears in journals such as Physical Review Letters, Physics Letters B and Journal of High Energy Physics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.