Scott Thomas

16.5k total citations · 1 hit paper
30 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Scott Thomas is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Computational Mechanics. According to data from OpenAlex, Scott Thomas has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Nuclear and High Energy Physics, 10 papers in Astronomy and Astrophysics and 3 papers in Computational Mechanics. Recurrent topics in Scott Thomas's work include Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (20 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (12 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (10 papers). Scott Thomas is often cited by papers focused on Particle physics theoretical and experimental studies (20 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (12 papers) and Cosmology and Gravitation Theories (10 papers). Scott Thomas collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and Netherlands. Scott Thomas's co-authors include Michael Dine, Lisa Randall, Lisa Randall, James D. Wells, Nathan Seiberg, Nir Polonsky, Nathaniel Craig, Patrick Draper, Glennys R. Farrar and Francesca Borzumati and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, Nuclear Physics B and Physics Letters B.

In The Last Decade

Scott Thomas

29 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

Baryogenesis from flat directions of the supersymmetric s... 1996 2026 2006 2016 1996 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Scott Thomas United States 17 1.3k 838 35 31 25 30 1.4k
Lisa Randall United States 24 1.8k 1.4× 976 1.2× 58 1.7× 54 1.7× 20 0.8× 48 1.9k
U. Klein Germany 17 397 0.3× 917 1.1× 22 0.6× 13 0.4× 12 0.5× 79 959
B. de Carlos United Kingdom 17 1.3k 1.0× 970 1.2× 24 0.7× 82 2.6× 19 0.8× 28 1.4k
G.K. Leontaris Greece 20 1.5k 1.1× 370 0.4× 32 0.9× 136 4.4× 20 0.8× 125 1.5k
R. Rosenfeld Brazil 16 1.2k 0.9× 701 0.8× 38 1.1× 70 2.3× 28 1.1× 75 1.3k
Adrià Gómez-Valent Spain 20 849 0.7× 1.3k 1.5× 35 1.0× 90 2.9× 84 3.4× 31 1.3k
Hrvoje Štefančić Croatia 11 444 0.3× 500 0.6× 12 0.3× 115 3.7× 31 1.2× 23 601
Jeff A. Dror United States 19 968 0.8× 668 0.8× 175 5.0× 33 1.1× 24 1.0× 36 1.1k
Sven Krippendorf Germany 16 628 0.5× 515 0.6× 35 1.0× 38 1.2× 16 0.6× 32 698
Anastasios Avgoustidis United Kingdom 16 522 0.4× 672 0.8× 44 1.3× 35 1.1× 23 0.9× 40 756

Countries citing papers authored by Scott Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Scott Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Scott Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Scott Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Scott Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Scott Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Scott Thomas. The network helps show where Scott Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Scott Thomas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Scott Thomas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Scott Thomas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Scott Thomas. Scott Thomas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Thomas, Scott, et al.. (2025). Low dose DNA methyltransferase inhibitors potentiate PARP inhibitors in homologous recombination repair deficient tumors. Breast Cancer Research. 27(1). 8–8. 4 indexed citations
2.
Graesser, Michael L., Jessie Shelton, & Scott Thomas. (2024). Discerning supersymmetry in adjacent branch cascade decay correlations. OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information).
3.
Tsang, Erica S., Rahul Aggarwal, Emily K. Bergsland, et al.. (2024). Updated Survival Follow-Up for Phase Ib Trial of the Histone Deacetylase Inhibitor Abexinostat With Pazopanib in Patients With Solid Tumor Malignancies. JCO Precision Oncology. 8(8). e2400328–e2400328. 2 indexed citations
4.
Craig, Nathaniel, Patrick Draper, Can Kılıç, & Scott Thomas. (2016). Shedding light on diphoton resonances. Physical review. D. 93(11). 51 indexed citations
5.
Craig, Nathaniel, Francesco D’Eramo, Patrick Draper, Scott Thomas, & Hao Zhang. (2015). The hunt for the rest of the Higgs bosons. Journal of High Energy Physics. 2015(6). 87 indexed citations
6.
Kılıç, Can, A. Lath, Keith Rose, & Scott Thomas. (2014). Jet extinction from nonperturbative quantum gravity effects. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 89(1). 3 indexed citations
7.
Contreras-Campana, E., S. Somalwar, A. Lath, et al.. (2012). Search for Anomalous Production of Multilepton Events and R-Parity-Violating Supersymmetry in √s = 7 TeV pp Collisions. APS. 2012. 2 indexed citations
8.
Elmiligui, Alaa, Floyd J. Wilcox, Susan E. Cliff, & Scott Thomas. (2012). Numerical Predictions of Sonic Boom Signatures for a Straight Line Segmented Leading Edge Model. 6 indexed citations
9.
Kılıç, Can & Scott Thomas. (2011). Signatures of resonant superpartner production with charged-current decays. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 84(5). 17 indexed citations
10.
Dine, Michael, Nathan Seiberg, & Scott Thomas. (2007). Higgs physics as a window beyond the MSSM. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology. 76(9). 114 indexed citations
11.
Ikenberry, G. John & Scott Thomas. (2005). The Global Resurgence of Religion and the Transformation of International Relations: The Struggle for the Soul of the Twenty-First Century. Foreign Affairs. 84(3). 132–132. 29 indexed citations
12.
Dimopoulos, Savas & Scott Thomas. (2003). Discretuum versus continuum dark energy. Physics Letters B. 573. 13–19. 17 indexed citations
13.
Graesser, Michael L. & Scott Thomas. (2002). Supersymmetric relations among electromagnetic dipole operators. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 65(7). 16 indexed citations
14.
Sarid, Uri & Scott Thomas. (2000). Mesino-Antimesino Oscillations. Physical Review Letters. 85(6). 1178–1181. 22 indexed citations
15.
Matchev, K. & Scott Thomas. (2000). Higgs and Z-boson signatures of supersymmetry. Physical review. D. Particles, fields, gravitation, and cosmology/Physical review. D. Particles and fields. 62(7). 27 indexed citations
16.
Thomas, Scott & James D. Wells. (1998). Phenomenology of Massive Vectorlike Doublet Leptons. Physical Review Letters. 81(1). 34–37. 96 indexed citations
17.
Cheung, Kingman, et al.. (1993). Detecting an intermediate mass charged Higgs at γγ colliders. Physics Letters B. 315(3-4). 399–405. 16 indexed citations
18.
Thomas, Scott, et al.. (1992). Light neutrinos from the quark condensate. Physics Letters B. 284(3-4). 341–346. 5 indexed citations
19.
Fischer, W., Gian F. Giudice, Robert G. Leigh, Sònia Paban, & Scott Thomas. (1991). The invisible majoron. Physics Letters B. 266(3-4). 408–412. 3 indexed citations
20.
Thomas, Scott, et al.. (1989). CFD simulation of square cross-section, contoured nozzle flows - Comparison with data. 27th Aerospace Sciences Meeting. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026