Michael Khodarkovsky
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Anthropology top 10%
- History top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- James ForsythChristoph Μ. SchmidtMaureen PerrieMarshall PoeJanet MartinDonald OstrowskiRichard HellieMartin Dimnik
- Topics
- Soviet and Russian History (11 papers)American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers)Russia and Soviet political economy (3 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe American Historical ReviewComparative Studies in Society and History
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Michael Khodarkovsky
18 papers receiving 98 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Political Science and International Relations 88
- Sociology and Political Science 65
- Anthropology 32
- History 18
- Economics and Econometrics 13
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Khodarkovsky
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Khodarkovsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Khodarkovsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Khodarkovsky more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Khodarkovsky
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Khodarkovsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Khodarkovsky. The network helps show where Michael Khodarkovsky may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Khodarkovsky
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Khodarkovsky. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Khodarkovsky based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Khodarkovsky. Michael Khodarkovsky is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 15 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 30 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | New Era: How Garry Kasparov Changed the World of Chess | 3 |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | 4 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Michael Khodarkovsky
Michael Khodarkovsky is a scholar working on Archeology, Political Science and International Relations and History, having authored 24 papers that have together received 167 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Soviet and Russian History (11 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (4 papers) and Russia and Soviet political economy (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (88 citations), Anthropology (32 citations) and General Energy (2 citations). Michael Khodarkovsky has collaborated with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include James Forsyth, Christoph Μ. Schmidt, Maureen Perrie, Marshall Poe, Janet Martin, Donald Ostrowski, Richard Hellie, Martin Dimnik, David E. Miller and Michael S. Flier. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The American Historical Review and Comparative Studies in Society and History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.