Michael K. Painter

630 total citations
12 papers, 331 citations indexed

About

Michael K. Painter is a scholar working on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Management Information Systems and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael K. Painter has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 331 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, 4 papers in Management Information Systems and 4 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Michael K. Painter's work include Manufacturing Process and Optimization (5 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (4 papers) and Business Process Modeling and Analysis (4 papers). Michael K. Painter is often cited by papers focused on Manufacturing Process and Optimization (5 papers), Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services (4 papers) and Business Process Modeling and Analysis (4 papers). Michael K. Painter collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. Michael K. Painter's co-authors include Richard J. Mayer, Benjamin Perakath, Christopher Menzel, Madhav Erraguntla, Gary L. Hogg, Ronald Fernandes, Bruno Lacerda, Nick Hawes and Rudolf Mayer and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling, Winter Simulation Conference and Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC).

In The Last Decade

Michael K. Painter

11 papers receiving 277 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael K. Painter United States 6 183 138 79 73 61 12 331
Vincent Chapurlat France 13 105 0.6× 103 0.7× 74 0.9× 58 0.8× 43 0.7× 48 351
Yuliu Chen China 9 139 0.8× 81 0.6× 27 0.3× 96 1.3× 43 0.7× 56 325
Joseph M. Mellichamp United States 9 78 0.4× 219 1.6× 71 0.9× 153 2.1× 36 0.6× 19 486
Michele Chinosi Italy 3 224 1.2× 192 1.4× 81 1.0× 64 0.9× 20 0.3× 4 372
Kurt Kosanke United States 10 237 1.3× 137 1.0× 53 0.7× 130 1.8× 92 1.5× 25 383
Matthew Hause United States 9 67 0.4× 87 0.6× 68 0.9× 38 0.5× 29 0.5× 68 325
Michel S. Soares Brazil 10 67 0.4× 217 1.6× 131 1.7× 30 0.4× 15 0.2× 81 401
Thierry Coudert France 9 72 0.4× 45 0.3× 73 0.9× 136 1.9× 75 1.2× 39 299
Manjunath Kamath United States 11 239 1.3× 64 0.5× 31 0.4× 213 2.9× 25 0.4× 40 449
Aurelijus Morkevičius Lithuania 10 89 0.5× 76 0.6× 46 0.6× 43 0.6× 19 0.3× 24 276

Countries citing papers authored by Michael K. Painter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael K. Painter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael K. Painter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael K. Painter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael K. Painter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael K. Painter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael K. Painter. The network helps show where Michael K. Painter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael K. Painter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael K. Painter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael K. Painter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael K. Painter. Michael K. Painter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
1.
Painter, Michael K., Bruno Lacerda, & Nick Hawes. (2020). Convex Hull Monte-Carlo Tree-Search. Proceedings of the International Conference on Automated Planning and Scheduling. 30. 217–225. 6 indexed citations
2.
Painter, Michael K., et al.. (2006). Using simulation, data mining, and knowledge discovery techniques for optimized aircraft engine fleet management. Winter Simulation Conference. 1253–1260. 15 indexed citations
4.
Painter, Michael K., et al.. (2005). Toward effective depot transformation: leveraging simulation to enhance transition planning. Winter Simulation Conference. 1242–1250.
5.
Painter, Michael K., et al.. (2003). New perspectives towards modeling depot MRO. 1. 738–746. 3 indexed citations
6.
Painter, Michael K., et al.. (2002). Methods and tools for aerospace operations modeling and simulation: new perspectives towards modeling depot MRO. Winter Simulation Conference. 738–746. 2 indexed citations
7.
Erraguntla, Madhav, et al.. (2002). A framework for adaptive process modeling and execution (FAME). 3–9. 2 indexed citations
8.
Mayer, Richard J., et al.. (2001). Supply chain process design toolkit (SCPDT). Winter Simulation Conference. 2. 1146–1154. 3 indexed citations
9.
Painter, Michael K., et al.. (1996). A methodology for integrating business process and information infrastructure models. 1305–1312. 11 indexed citations
10.
Mayer, Richard J., et al.. (1995). INFORMATION INTEGRATION FOR CONCURRENT ENGINEERING (IICE) TOWARD A METHOD FOR BUSINESS CONSTRAINT DISCOVERY (IDEF9). 5 indexed citations
11.
Mayer, Richard J., et al.. (1995). Information Integration for Concurrent Engineering (IICE) IDEF3 Process Description Capture Method Report. Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC). 180 indexed citations
12.
Mayer, Richard J., et al.. (1994). IDEF Family of Methods for Concurrent Engineering and Business Re-engineering Applications. 91 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026