Michael J. Raher
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Physiology top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 10%
- Epidemiology
- Co-authors
- Kenneth D. BlochMarielle Scherrer‐CrosbieFumito IchinoseEmmanuel S. BuysMichael H. PicardHélène ThibaultWarren M. ZapolGeneviève Dérumeaux
- Topics
- Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (8 papers)Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (7 papers)Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceBelgium
In The Last Decade
Michael J. Raher
24 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 641
- Physiology 504
- Molecular Biology 448
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 322
- Epidemiology 185
Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Raher
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Raher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Raher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Raher more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Raher
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Raher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Raher. The network helps show where Michael J. Raher may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael J. Raher
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael J. Raher. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael J. Raher based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael J. Raher. Michael J. Raher is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 33 | |
| 3 | 36 | |
| 4 | 44 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 44 | |
| 9 | 63 | |
| 10 | 146 | |
| 11 | 42 | |
| 12 | 171 | |
| 13 | 90 | |
| 14 | 62 | |
| 15 | 97 | |
| 16 | 59 | |
| 17 | 42 | |
| 18 | 145 | |
| 19 | 120 | |
| 20 | 80 |
About Michael J. Raher
Michael J. Raher is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Physiology and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Nitric Oxide and Endothelin Effects (8 papers), Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (7 papers) and Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (641 citations), Physiology (504 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (121 citations). Michael J. Raher has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Belgium. Frequent co-authors include Kenneth D. Bloch, Marielle Scherrer‐Crosbie, Fumito Ichinose, Emmanuel S. Buys, Michael H. Picard, Hélène Thibault, Warren M. Zapol, Geneviève Dérumeaux, Elkan F. Halpern and Stefan Janssens. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Circulation and Anesthesiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.