Michael J. Neep

444 total citations
19 papers, 290 citations indexed

About

Michael J. Neep is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael J. Neep has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 290 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 7 papers in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine and 5 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Michael J. Neep's work include Radiology practices and education (15 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (9 papers) and Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (7 papers). Michael J. Neep is often cited by papers focused on Radiology practices and education (15 papers), Radiation Dose and Imaging (9 papers) and Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (7 papers). Michael J. Neep collaborates with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and Canada. Michael J. Neep's co-authors include Steven McPhail, Andrew Murphy, Rebecca Owen, Ernest Ekpo, CJ Hughes, Kelly Spuur and Elaine Ryan and has published in prestigious journals such as Emergency Medicine Australasia, Radiography and Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology.

In The Last Decade

Michael J. Neep

17 papers receiving 288 citations

Peers

Michael J. Neep

RNMI

CCICM

PRM

PHARM

Caroline Carrico United States

Perry G. Pernicano United States

Jason Matos United States

Abbas Aroua Switzerland

Alexandros Stefanidis Greece

Arthur Lieveld Netherlands

Michael Hickman United Kingdom

Paramjit Jeetley United Kingdom

Núria Zellweger Switzerland

Dorte Guldbrand Nielsen Denmark

Caroline Carrico United States

Michael J. Neep

192 ×0.7

RNMI

44 ×0.5

CCICM

30 ×0.6

41 ×0.9

PRM

0 ×0.0

PHARM

Citations per year, relative to Michael J. Neep Michael J. Neep (= 1×) peers Caroline Carrico

Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Neep

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Neep's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Neep with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Neep more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Neep

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Neep. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Neep. The network helps show where Michael J. Neep may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael J. Neep

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael J. Neep. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael J. Neep based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael J. Neep. Michael J. Neep is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

19 of 19 papers shown

Neep, Michael J., et al.. (2024). Analysing false‐positive errors when Australian radiographers use preliminary image evaluation. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 71(4). 540–546.

Neep, Michael J., et al.. (2024). Multi‐centre digital radiography reject analysis for different clinical room use types: The establishment of local reject reference levels for public hospital departments. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 71(3). 412–420.

Neep, Michael J., et al.. (2022). Is there benefit to concurrent x‐ray imaging of the wrist, forearm and elbow in paediatric patients following a fall on the outstretched hand?. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 69(4). 431–438. 2 indexed citations

Neep, Michael J., et al.. (2022). Reducing diagnostic errors in the emergency department at the time of patient treatment. Emergency Medicine Australasia. 35(3). 466–473. 5 indexed citations

Neep, Michael J., et al.. (2021). Digital radiography reject analysis of examinations with multiple rejects: an Australian emergency imaging department clinical audit. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 68(3). 245–252. 17 indexed citations

Neep, Michael J., et al.. (2021). An analysis of radiographer preliminary image evaluation – A focus on common false negatives. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 68(3). 237–244. 17 indexed citations

Neep, Michael J., et al.. (2020). Communicating traumatic pathology to ensure shared understanding: is there a recipe for the perfect preliminary image evaluation?. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 67(2). 143–150. 11 indexed citations

Neep, Michael J., et al.. (2020). COVID‐19 Pandemic – considerations and challenges for the management of medical imaging departments in Queensland. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 67(4). 345–351. 15 indexed citations

Neep, Michael J., et al.. (2019). Reject rate analysis in digital radiography: an Australian emergency imaging department case study. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 67(1). 72–79. 40 indexed citations

10.

Neep, Michael J., et al.. (2019). Reducing risk in the emergency department: a 12‐month prospective longitudinal study of radiographer preliminary image evaluations. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 66(3). 154–162. 25 indexed citations

11.

Murphy, Andrew, et al.. (2019). Radiographic image interpretation by Australian radiographers: a systematic review. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 66(4). 269–283. 34 indexed citations

12.

Neep, Michael J., et al.. (2018). Evaluating the effectiveness of intensive versus non‐intensive image interpretation education for radiographers: a randomised controlled trial. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 66(1). 5–13. 10 indexed citations

13.

Murphy, Andrew & Michael J. Neep. (2018). An investigation into the use of radiographer abnormality detection systems by Queensland public hospitals. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 65(2). 80–85. 21 indexed citations

14.

Neep, Michael J., et al.. (2018). Evaluating the effectiveness of intensive versus non‐intensive image interpretation education for radiographers: a randomised control trial study protocol. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 65(1). 63–70. 5 indexed citations

15.

Neep, Michael J., et al.. (2017). Development of a valid and reliable test to assess trauma radiograph interpretation performance. Radiography. 23(2). 153–158. 12 indexed citations

16.

Neep, Michael J., et al.. (2014). Radiographer commenting of trauma radiographs: A survey of the benefits, barriers and enablers to participation in an Australian healthcare setting. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology. 58(4). 431–438. 31 indexed citations

17.

Neep, Michael J., et al.. (2014). A survey of radiographers' confidence and self‐perceived accuracy in frontline image interpretation and their continuing educational preferences. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 61(2). 69–77. 37 indexed citations

18.

Neep, Michael J., et al.. (2012). Radiographic evaluation of hip replacements. 1 indexed citations

19.

Neep, Michael J., et al.. (2011). Radiography of the acutely injured shoulder. Radiography. 17(3). 188–192. 7 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact