Kelly Spuur

517 total citations
45 papers, 326 citations indexed

About

Kelly Spuur is a scholar working on Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, Kelly Spuur has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 326 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 21 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, 19 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 16 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in Kelly Spuur's work include Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (18 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (15 papers) and AI in cancer detection (14 papers). Kelly Spuur is often cited by papers focused on Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging (18 papers), Global Cancer Incidence and Screening (15 papers) and AI in cancer detection (14 papers). Kelly Spuur collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Jordan and Papua New Guinea. Kelly Spuur's co-authors include Geoffrey Currie, Mary Rickard, Ann Poulos, Xiaoming Zheng, Christopher M. Hayre, Dana S. Al‐Mousa, Sharon Nielsen, Wai Tak Hung, Margaret McAllister and Jennifer Wilkinson and has published in prestigious journals such as European Journal of Radiology, Current Oncology and Journal of Imaging.

In The Last Decade

Kelly Spuur

39 papers receiving 318 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kelly Spuur Australia 9 131 91 84 84 78 45 326
Martín-José Sepúlveda United States 5 106 0.8× 35 0.4× 109 1.3× 97 1.2× 41 0.5× 9 281
Eniola Oluyemi United States 11 287 2.2× 69 0.8× 181 2.2× 170 2.0× 72 0.9× 59 494
Sheng-Chieh Lu United States 11 54 0.4× 43 0.5× 64 0.8× 69 0.8× 25 0.3× 27 339
Matthew Nagy United States 9 58 0.4× 42 0.5× 60 0.7× 59 0.7× 32 0.4× 26 325
Natalie Gangai United States 11 165 1.3× 118 1.3× 18 0.2× 34 0.4× 62 0.8× 42 318
Chiara Maria Lavinia Löffler Germany 4 159 1.2× 32 0.4× 287 3.4× 209 2.5× 26 0.3× 7 514
Emilio Madrigal United States 11 67 0.5× 52 0.6× 29 0.3× 76 0.9× 29 0.4× 26 273
Niki Oveisi Canada 8 190 1.5× 70 0.8× 13 0.2× 39 0.5× 81 1.0× 15 415
Natansh D. Modi Australia 12 42 0.3× 108 1.2× 57 0.7× 39 0.5× 58 0.7× 25 284
Ada Muellner United States 8 210 1.6× 20 0.2× 22 0.3× 25 0.3× 99 1.3× 15 324

Countries citing papers authored by Kelly Spuur

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kelly Spuur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kelly Spuur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kelly Spuur more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kelly Spuur

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kelly Spuur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kelly Spuur. The network helps show where Kelly Spuur may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kelly Spuur

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kelly Spuur. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kelly Spuur based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kelly Spuur. Kelly Spuur is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Spuur, Kelly, et al.. (2025). Documentation of contrast hypersensitivity reactions: a socio-ecological scoping review. European Journal of Radiology. 194. 112539–112539.
2.
Al‐Mousa, Dana S., et al.. (2025). Beyond technical proficiency: A scoping review of the role of soft skills in medical radiation science. Radiography. 31(3). 102924–102924. 2 indexed citations
3.
Chau, Minh, Kelly Spuur, & Jae‐Young Han. (2025). Rural resilience: A collaborative autoethnographic study of medical radiation practitioners. Radiography. 31(6). 103178–103178. 1 indexed citations
4.
Spuur, Kelly, et al.. (2023). The effect of inappropriate patient centring on CT numbers and radiation dose: A survey of current practices and knowledge. Radiography. 30(1). 100–106. 1 indexed citations
5.
Currie, Geoffrey, et al.. (2023). ChatGPT in medical imaging higher education. Radiography. 29(4). 792–799. 77 indexed citations
6.
Neep, Michael J., et al.. (2022). Is there benefit to concurrent x‐ray imaging of the wrist, forearm and elbow in paediatric patients following a fall on the outstretched hand?. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 69(4). 431–438. 2 indexed citations
7.
Zheng, Xiaoming, et al.. (2022). The influence of patient positioning on radiation dose in CT imaging: A narrative review. Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences. 53(4). 737–747. 7 indexed citations
8.
Currie, Geoffrey, et al.. (2022). Australian perspectives on artificial intelligence in medical imaging. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 69(3). 282–292. 20 indexed citations
10.
Al‐Mousa, Dana S., et al.. (2021). The influence of breast density and key demographics of radiographers on mammography reporting performance – a pilot study. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 69(1). 30–36. 2 indexed citations
11.
Spuur, Kelly, et al.. (2021). The reliability of CT numbers as absolute values for diagnostic scanning, dental imaging, and radiation therapy simulation: A narrative review. Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences. 53(1). 138–146. 1 indexed citations
12.
Al‐Mousa, Dana S., et al.. (2020). The implications of increased mammographic breast density for breast screening in Jordan. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 67(4). 277–283. 6 indexed citations
13.
Spuur, Kelly, et al.. (2020). Correlation of the BI‐RADS assessment categories of Papua New Guinean women with mammographic parenchymal patterns, age and diagnosis. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 67(4). 269–276. 2 indexed citations
14.
Currie, Geoffrey, et al.. (2020). COVID-19 impact on undergraduate teaching: Medical radiation science teaching team experience. Journal of medical imaging and radiation sciences. 51(4). 518–527. 44 indexed citations
15.
Wilkinson, Jennifer, et al.. (2020). Full‐field digital mammography: the ‘30% rule’ and influences on visualisation of the pectoralis major muscle on the craniocaudal view of the breast. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 67(3). 177–184. 2 indexed citations
16.
Spuur, Kelly, et al.. (2018). Undergraduate use of medical radiation science mobile applications. Radiography. 24(4). 352–359. 3 indexed citations
17.
Spuur, Kelly, et al.. (2018). Mammography image quality and evidence based practice: Analysis of the demonstration of the inframammary angle in the digital setting. European Journal of Radiology. 100. 76–84. 12 indexed citations
18.
Zheng, Xiaoming, et al.. (2018). Knowledge and Awareness of CT Radiation Dose and Risk Among Patients. Journal of diagnostic medical sonography. 34(5). 347–355. 7 indexed citations
19.
Noonan, Sara, Kelly Spuur, & Sharon Nielsen. (2017). Immobilisation in Australian paediatric medical imaging: A pilot study. Radiography. 23(2). e34–e40. 6 indexed citations
20.
Spuur, Kelly, et al.. (2010). Mammography: Correlation of pectoral muscle width and the length in the mediolateral oblique view of the breast. Radiography. 16(4). 286–291. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026