Michael J. Johnson

40 papers receiving 393 citations

Peers

Michael J. Johnson
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
  • Aging 16
  • Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design 21
  • Computational Mechanics 117
  • Applied Mathematics 49
  • Geochemistry and Petrology 26
Replace Zhijian Wang with:
Zhijian Wang China
Iván Bermejo-Moreno United States
Saumya Singh India
Wonho Oh United States
Ute Hahn Denmark
C. M. Gold Canada
J. Anthony Parker United States
J. A. R. Blais Canada
Hiroaki Kobayashi Japan
Biao Li China
Michael J. Johnson relative to Zhijian Wang China Zhijian Wang's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.7×
Zhijian Wang · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Johnson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Johnson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Johnson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Johnson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Johnson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Johnson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Johnson. The network helps show where Michael J. Johnson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael J. Johnson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael J. Johnson Line = papers co-authored together Michael J. Johnson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 43 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200493
2 201257
3 202025
4 200920
5 199718
6 200918
7 200916
8 200714
9 199713
10 200212
11 200312
12 200012
13 200110
14 199710
15 20008
16 20097
17 20047
18 20016
19 20086
20 20156

About Michael J. Johnson

Michael J. Johnson is a scholar working on Computational Mechanics, Global and Planetary Change, Applied Mathematics, Mechanics of Materials and Numerical Analysis, having authored 43 papers that have together received 426 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Advanced Numerical Analysis Techniques (19 papers), Advanced Numerical Methods in Computational Mathematics (10 papers), Numerical methods in engineering (5 papers), Water Quality and Resources Studies (4 papers), Groundwater flow and contamination studies (4 papers), Mathematical Analysis and Transform Methods (4 papers), Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics (4 papers) and Radioactive contamination and transfer (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Aging (16 citations), Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design (21 citations), Computational Mechanics (117 citations), Applied Mathematics (49 citations) and Geochemistry and Petrology (26 citations). Michael J. Johnson has collaborated with scholars based in Kuwait, United States and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Ian Welsh, Timothy P. O’Brien, Robert W. Burgess, Jeffrey J. Roix, Kevin A. Peterson, B. J. Andraski, Michael Kriss, Gina Hong, Li Wang and Daniel G. Stover. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Approximation Theory, Constructive Approximation, Numerische Mathematik, Mathematical and Computer Modelling and Journal of Environmental Quality.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact