Michael H. Whitworth
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- History top 10%
- Modeling and Simulation
- Co-authors
- Anna SnaithG. J. Meléndez‐TorresGeorge PattonHarry RutterG. James RubinRussell VinerChris BonellM. Brooke Rogers
- Topics
- Contemporary Literature and Criticism (3 papers)Modernist Literature and Criticism (3 papers)Poetry Analysis and Criticism (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomIndiaAustralia
In The Last Decade
Michael H. Whitworth
13 papers receiving 73 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
- Literature and Literary Theory 55
- Clinical Psychology 19
- Sociology and Political Science 17
- History 12
- Modeling and Simulation 11
Countries citing papers authored by Michael H. Whitworth
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael H. Whitworth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael H. Whitworth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael H. Whitworth more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael H. Whitworth
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael H. Whitworth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael H. Whitworth. The network helps show where Michael H. Whitworth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael H. Whitworth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael H. Whitworth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael H. Whitworth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael H. Whitworth. Michael H. Whitworth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 27 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 9 | |
| 8 | 23 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | Locating Woolf: The Politics of Space and Place | 10 |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | Pièces d'identité: T. S. Eliot, J. W. N. Sullivan and Poetic Impersonality | 3 |
| 19 | 1 |
About Michael H. Whitworth
Michael H. Whitworth is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History and Philosophy of Science and Modeling and Simulation, having authored 19 papers that have together received 107 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Contemporary Literature and Criticism (3 papers), Modernist Literature and Criticism (3 papers) and Poetry Analysis and Criticism (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (55 citations), Modeling and Simulation (11 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (7 citations). Michael H. Whitworth has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Anna Snaith, G. J. Meléndez‐Torres, George Patton, Harry Rutter, G. James Rubin, Russell Viner, Chris Bonell, M. Brooke Rogers, Hermione Lee and David H. Bradshaw. Their work appears in journals such as Health & Place, Isis and Interdisciplinary Science Reviews.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.