Michael H. Tarbit

2.8k citations
43 papers · 2.3k indexed · h-index 27

Impact in

Papers in

Michael H. Tarbit

42 papers receiving 2.2k citations

Peers

Michael H. Tarbit
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
  • Pharmacology 931
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 419
  • Infectious Diseases 443
  • Biochemistry 154
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 165
Replace Qingcheng Mao with:
Qingcheng Mao United States
Don K. Walker United Kingdom
Guoxin Hu China
Oliver von Richter Germany
David R. Jones United States
Hannah M. Jones United States
James L. Maggs United Kingdom
Jean‐Charles Gautier France
Philip C. Smith United States
M. Matilde Marques Portugal
Michael H. Tarbit relative to Qingcheng Mao United States Qingcheng Mao's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Qingcheng Mao · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael H. Tarbit

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael H. Tarbit's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael H. Tarbit with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael H. Tarbit more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael H. Tarbit

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael H. Tarbit. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael H. Tarbit. The network helps show where Michael H. Tarbit may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael H. Tarbit, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael H. Tarbit Line = papers co-authored together Michael H. Tarbit links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 2002166
2 199949
3 199959
4 199946
5 199856
6 19960
7 1996255
8 199680
9 199469
10 199356
11 19922
12 199152
13 198835
14 198829
15 198828
16 198839
17 19881
18 198640
19 19835
20 197019

About Michael H. Tarbit

Michael H. Tarbit is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Biochemistry, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Infectious Diseases and Spectroscopy, having authored 43 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (18 papers), Antifungal resistance and susceptibility (9 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (8 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (7 papers), Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography (5 papers), Nail Diseases and Treatments (3 papers), Drug-Induced Hepatotoxicity and Protection (3 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (931 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (419 citations), Infectious Diseases (443 citations), Biochemistry (154 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (165 citations). Michael H. Tarbit has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Uganda. Frequent co-authors include Michael Humphrey, Peter Eddershaw, S. Jevons, Peter S. Goldfarb, Alan Beresford, G Farrer-Brown, J. O. W. Beilby, David F. Lewis, Harold E. Selick and Gillian Smith. Their work appears in journals such as Drug Metabolism and Disposition, Xenobiotica, BJOG An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Biochemical Pharmacology and Biochemical Society Transactions.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026