Michael Friedman
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- History and Philosophy of Science top 2%
- Social Psychology
- Philosophy top 5%
- Co-authors
- Daniel S. MasonDavid L. AndrewsMilena M. ParentMichael SilkCathy van IngenImmanuel KantGary HatfieldHenry E. Allison
- Topics
- Sports, Gender, and Society (12 papers)Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (11 papers)Cultural Industries and Urban Development (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Michael Friedman
29 papers receiving 417 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Sociology and Political Science 273
- Gender Studies 152
- History and Philosophy of Science 82
- Social Psychology 63
- Philosophy 55
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Friedman
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Friedman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Friedman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Friedman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Friedman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Friedman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Friedman. The network helps show where Michael Friedman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Friedman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Friedman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Friedman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Friedman. Michael Friedman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 7 | |
| 8 | 37 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 4 | |
| 12 | Settlement Houses: Improving the Social Welfare of America's Immigrants | 3 |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 23 | |
| 15 | 76 | |
| 16 | Dynamics of reason : the 1999 Kant Lectures at Stanford University | 62 |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 0 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Michael Friedman
Michael Friedman is a scholar working on General Psychology, Gender Studies and Theoretical Computer Science, having authored 35 papers that have together received 482 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sports, Gender, and Society (12 papers), Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (11 papers) and Cultural Industries and Urban Development (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (82 citations), Gender Studies (152 citations) and Theoretical Computer Science (9 citations). Michael Friedman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Daniel S. Mason, David L. Andrews, Milena M. Parent, Michael Silk, Cathy van Ingen, Immanuel Kant, Gary Hatfield, Henry E. Allison, Peter Heath and Hilary Putnam. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, Community Dentistry And Oral Epidemiology and Noûs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.