Michael Francis Johnston
- Complementary and alternative medicine top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Oncology
- Plant Science
- General Health Professions
- Co-authors
- Ron D. HaysK K HuiKa-Kit HuiMarc BrodskyKaren L. SpritzerOscar GruskyHongjie LiuPhillip Bonacich
- Topics
- Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (6 papers)Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (5 papers)Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesHong KongCanada
In The Last Decade
Michael Francis Johnston
19 papers receiving 514 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
- Complementary and alternative medicine 124
- Sociology and Political Science 79
- Oncology 65
- Plant Science 57
- General Health Professions 52
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Francis Johnston
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Francis Johnston's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Francis Johnston with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Francis Johnston more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Francis Johnston
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Francis Johnston. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Francis Johnston. The network helps show where Michael Francis Johnston may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Francis Johnston
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Francis Johnston. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Francis Johnston based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Francis Johnston. Michael Francis Johnston is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 17 | |
| 4 | 70 | |
| 5 | Considering the feasibility of introducing nurse practitioners into Japanese thoracic services. | 1 |
| 6 | 38 | |
| 7 | 153 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 12 | |
| 14 | 22 | |
| 15 | 89 | |
| 16 | 36 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 3 | |
| 19 | 48 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About Michael Francis Johnston
Michael Francis Johnston is a scholar working on Complementary and alternative medicine, Sociology and Political Science and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 21 papers that have together received 538 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Acupuncture Treatment Research Studies (6 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (5 papers) and Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Complementary and alternative medicine (124 citations), Biochemistry (26 citations) and Insect Science (33 citations). Michael Francis Johnston has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Hong Kong and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Ron D. Hays, K K Hui, Ka-Kit Hui, Marc Brodsky, Karen L. Spritzer, Oscar Grusky, Hongjie Liu, Phillip Bonacich, Wenhui Li and Elizabeth Ortíz-Sánchez. Their work appears in journals such as AIDS and Behavior, Social Networks and Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.