Michael Field

883 citations
34 papers · 530 indexed · h-index 15

Impact in

Papers in

Michael Field

34 papers receiving 486 citations

Peers

Michael Field
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics 226
  • Mathematical Physics 164
  • Geometry and Topology 88
  • Computer Networks and Communications 200
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 68
Replace Jean-René Chazottes with:
Jean-René Chazottes France
A. Yu. Kolesov Russia
Reiner Lauterbach Germany
Н. Х. Розов Russia
Evelyn Sander United States
Andrei Török United States
J. M. Gambaudo France
William D. Kalies United States
Christopher McCord United States
Frederick R. Marotto United States
Michael Field relative to Jean-René Chazottes France Jean-René Chazottes's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Jean-René Chazottes · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael Field

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Field's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Field with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Field more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Field

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Field. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Field. The network helps show where Michael Field may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Field, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael Field Line = papers co-authored together Michael Field links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20232
2
Analytic Characterization of the Hessian in Shallow ReLU Models: A Tale of Symmetry
20201
3 20187
4 20179
5 20114
6 20101
7 201014
8 201010
9 200932
10 200732
11 200514
12 200514
13 20044
14 200311
15 199928
16 199953
17 199619
18 199520
19
Symmetries on the edge of chaos
19931
20 199116

About Michael Field

Michael Field is a scholar working on Mathematical Physics, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Architecture, Geometry and Topology and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 34 papers that have together received 530 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mathematical Dynamics and Fractals (11 papers), Nonlinear Dynamics and Pattern Formation (11 papers), Quantum chaos and dynamical systems (10 papers), Chaos control and synchronization (5 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (3 papers), Homotopy and Cohomology in Algebraic Topology (3 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (2 papers) and Geometry and complex manifolds (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Statistical and Nonlinear Physics (226 citations), Mathematical Physics (164 citations), Geometry and Topology (88 citations), Computer Networks and Communications (200 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (68 citations). Michael Field has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Romania. Frequent co-authors include Martin Golubitsky, Ian Melbourne, Peter Ashwin, O.A. Asbjørnsen, Andrei Török, William Parry, Nikita Agarwal, R. Friedberg, Matthew Nicol and Christian Bick. Their work appears in journals such as Nonlinearity, Journal of Nonlinear Science, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society, Dynamical Systems and Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026