Michael F. Bird
- Religious studies top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Archeology top 5%
- Philosophy top 10%
- Civil and Structural Engineering
- Co-authors
- Howard SmithJohn K. HewittMartin Hengel
- Topics
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation (38 papers)Historical and Linguistic Studies (14 papers)Christian Theology and Mission (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Michael F. Bird
36 papers receiving 109 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Religious studies 107
- Sociology and Political Science 65
- Archeology 44
- Philosophy 26
- Civil and Structural Engineering 19
Countries citing papers authored by Michael F. Bird
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael F. Bird's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael F. Bird with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael F. Bird more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael F. Bird
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael F. Bird. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael F. Bird. The network helps show where Michael F. Bird may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael F. Bird
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael F. Bird. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael F. Bird based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael F. Bird. Michael F. Bird is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | King and Messiah as Son of God: Divine, Human, and Angelic Messianic Figures in Biblical and Related Literature | 10 |
| 8 | The faith of Jesus Christ: exegetical, biblical, and theological studies | 13 |
| 9 | Colossians and Philemon: A new covenant commentary | 0 |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | Jesus and the Origins of the Gentile Mission | 2 |
| 13 | When the dust finally settles: Reaching a post-new perspective | 3 |
| 14 | Incorporated righteousness: A response to recent evangelical discussion concerning the imputation of Christ's righteousness in justification | 3 |
| 15 | The crucifixion of Jesus as the fulfillment of Mark 9:1 | 0 |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | INTERSEGMENTAL COORDINATION: AN EXPLORATION OF CONTEXT | 3 |
| 18 | 14 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About Michael F. Bird
Michael F. Bird is a scholar working on Religious studies, Archeology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 55 papers that have together received 173 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Biblical Studies and Interpretation (38 papers), Historical and Linguistic Studies (14 papers) and Christian Theology and Mission (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear Energy and Engineering (10 citations), Religious studies (107 citations) and Archeology (44 citations). Michael F. Bird has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Howard Smith, John K. Hewitt and Martin Hengel. Their work appears in journals such as Corrosion Science, Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry and Harvard Theological Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.