Michael Danovsky
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 1%
- Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Resilience and Mental Health
Papers in ⓘ
-
- Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare 3
-
- Optimism, Hope, and Well-being 2
- Co-authors
- Michael A. Rapoff (3 shared papers)L Ware (1 shared paper)C. R. Snyder (1 shared paper)William E. Pelham (1 shared paper)Betsy Hoza (1 shared paper)Deidre Donaldson (2 shared papers)Anthony Spirito (1 shared paper)Mitchell J. Prinstein (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Pediatric Psychology (3 papers)Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry (2 papers)American Journal of Orthopsychiatry (1 paper)Journal of Asthma (1 paper)Heart Rhythm (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Michael Danovsky
8 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 91
- Applied Psychology 520
- Clinical Psychology 609
- Social Psychology 421
- Safety Research 153
- Speech and Hearing 122
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Danovsky
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Danovsky's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Danovsky with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Danovsky more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Danovsky
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Danovsky. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Danovsky. The network helps show where Michael Danovsky may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael Danovsky, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Development and Validation of the Children’s Hope Scale Hit paper breakdown → | 1997 | 871 |
| 2 | 2000 | 139 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 131 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 77 | |
| 5 | 1995 | 61 | |
| 6 | 1997 | 38 | |
| 7 | 1997 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 7 |
About Michael Danovsky
Michael Danovsky is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Applied Psychology, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, Clinical Psychology and Emergency Medicine, having authored 8 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare (3 papers), Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life (3 papers), Optimism, Hope, and Well-being (2 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (2 papers), Resilience and Mental Health (2 papers), Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues (1 paper), Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation (1 paper) and Child Abuse and Trauma (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (520 citations), Clinical Psychology (609 citations), Social Psychology (421 citations), Safety Research (153 citations) and Speech and Hearing (122 citations). Michael Danovsky has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael A. Rapoff, L Ware, C. R. Snyder, William E. Pelham, Betsy Hoza, Deidre Donaldson, Anthony Spirito, Mitchell J. Prinstein, Kevin J. Lourie and Ralph J. DiClemente. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pediatric Psychology, Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Journal of Asthma and Heart Rhythm.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.