Michael D. Hargreaves
- Biophysics top 0.5%
- Analytical Chemistry top 1%
- Archeology top 1%
- Molecular Biology
- Spectroscopy top 5%
- Co-authors
- Howell G. M. EdwardsTasnim MunshiIan J. ScowenPavel MatousekEsam M. A. AliH. G. M. EdwardsPeter VandenabeeleKristian Page
- Topics
- Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (17 papers)Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (11 papers)Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Michael D. Hargreaves
38 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Biophysics 412
- Analytical Chemistry 352
- Archeology 262
- Molecular Biology 201
- Spectroscopy 193
Countries citing papers authored by Michael D. Hargreaves
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael D. Hargreaves's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael D. Hargreaves with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael D. Hargreaves more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael D. Hargreaves
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael D. Hargreaves. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael D. Hargreaves. The network helps show where Michael D. Hargreaves may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael D. Hargreaves
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael D. Hargreaves. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael D. Hargreaves based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael D. Hargreaves. Michael D. Hargreaves is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 17 | |
| 2 | Infrared and Raman spectroscopy in forensic science | 74 |
| 3 | 21 | |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 55 | |
| 7 | 41 | |
| 8 | 58 | |
| 9 | 16 | |
| 10 | 29 | |
| 11 | 73 | |
| 12 | 14 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 35 | |
| 15 | 40 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 26 | |
| 18 | 120 | |
| 19 | 46 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Michael D. Hargreaves
Michael D. Hargreaves is a scholar working on Biophysics, Toxicology and Analytical Chemistry, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spectroscopy Techniques in Biomedical and Chemical Research (17 papers), Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses (11 papers) and Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biophysics (412 citations), Conservation (142 citations) and Analytical Chemistry (352 citations). Michael D. Hargreaves has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Howell G. M. Edwards, Tasnim Munshi, Ian J. Scowen, Pavel Matousek, Esam M. A. Ali, H. G. M. Edwards, Peter Vandenabeele, Kristian Page, John M. Chalmers and Pavel Vítek. Their work appears in journals such as Analytica Chimica Acta, The Analyst and Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.