Michael D. Bailey
- Classics top 2%
- Medieval Literature and History 8
- Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies 2
- History top 2%
- Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 10
- Historical and Religious Studies of Rome 4
- Religious studies top 5%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices 9
- Archeology top 5%
- Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies 5
-
- Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies 6
-
- Colonialism, slavery, and trade 2
- Co-authors
- Edward PetersDouglas J. LoberYongming SangJoan K. LunneyGourapura J. RenukaradhyaManos AntonakakisAngelos D. KeromytisZakir Durumeric
- Cited by
- ClassicsHistoryReligious studies
- Journals
- Speculum (3 papers)The American Historical Review (2 papers)Nova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomIndia
In The Last Decade
Michael D. Bailey
24 papers receiving 125 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Classics 65
- History 80
- Religious studies 21
- Philosophy 41
- Archeology 34
Countries citing papers authored by Michael D. Bailey
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael D. Bailey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael D. Bailey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael D. Bailey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael D. Bailey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael D. Bailey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael D. Bailey. The network helps show where Michael D. Bailey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Michael D. Bailey, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 8 | Magic and Witchcraft : Critical Concepts in Historical Studies | 2014 | 1 |
| 9 | 2013 | 0 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 10 | |
| 11 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2009 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2009 | 0 | |
| 14 | Magic and Superstition in Europe: A Concise History from Antiquity to the Present | 2006 | 20 |
| 15 | 2006 | 0 | |
| 16 | 2006 | 19 | |
| 17 | 2006 | 3 | |
| 18 | 2006 | 22 | |
| 19 | 2001 | 33 | |
| 20 | 1997 | 2 |
About Michael D. Bailey
Michael D. Bailey is a scholar working on Classics, History, Philosophy, Religious studies and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 35 papers that have together received 192 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (10 papers), Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices (9 papers), Medieval Literature and History (8 papers), Folklore, Mythology, and Literature Studies (6 papers), Historical, Religious, and Philosophical Studies (5 papers), Historical and Religious Studies of Rome (4 papers), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (2 papers) and Colonialism, slavery, and trade (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (65 citations), History (80 citations), Religious studies (21 citations), Philosophy (41 citations) and Archeology (34 citations). Michael D. Bailey has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Edward Peters, Douglas J. Lober, Yongming Sang, Joan K. Lunney, Gourapura J. Renukaradhya, Manos Antonakakis, Angelos D. Keromytis, Zakir Durumeric, Zane Ma and Fabian Monrose. Their work appears in journals such as Speculum, The American Historical Review, Nova Religio The Journal of Alternative and Emergent Religions, Past & Present and Exemplaria.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.