Michael C. Stoner

2.0k citations
99 papers · 1.2k · h-index 18

Impact in

Papers in

Michael C. Stoner

90 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Michael C. Stoner
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 935
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 580
  • Internal Medicine 81
  • Neurology 217
  • Surgery 512
Replace Peter C. Spittell with:
Peter C. Spittell United States
Oren K. Steinmetz Canada
Thomas Troëng Sweden
Κωνσταντίνος Σπανός Greece
Metin Demircin Türkiye
Mark Langsfeld United States
Emiliano Chisci Italy
George Kouvelos Greece
J.F. Fairhead United Kingdom
Daryl S Kucey Canada
Michael C. Stoner relative to Peter C. Spittell United States Peter C. Spittell's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.6×
Peter C. Spittell · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michael C. Stoner

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael C. Stoner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael C. Stoner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael C. Stoner more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael C. Stoner

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael C. Stoner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael C. Stoner. The network helps show where Michael C. Stoner may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael C. Stoner, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michael C. Stoner Line = papers co-authored together Michael C. Stoner links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 99 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2005117
2 200689
3 201783
4 200572
5 200570
6 201053
7 201151
8 200450
9 200737
10 201035
11 200831
12 201128
13 200727
14 201025
15 200524
16 201420
17 201517
18 200517
19 201717
20 201917

About Michael C. Stoner

Michael C. Stoner is a scholar working on Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Neurology and Epidemiology, having authored 99 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Aortic aneurysm repair treatments (43 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (36 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (24 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (24 papers), Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (18 papers), Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications (17 papers), Vascular Procedures and Complications (16 papers) and Peripheral Artery Disease Management (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (935 citations), Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (580 citations), Internal Medicine (81 citations), Neurology (217 citations) and Surgery (512 citations). Michael C. Stoner has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include Frank M. Parker, William M. Bogey, Charles S. Powell, Richard P. Cambria, David C. Brewster, Glenn M. LaMuraglia, William M. Abbott, Hong Hua, Christopher J. Kwolek and Michael T. Watkins. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Vascular Surgery, Annals of Vascular Surgery, Journal of Surgical Research, Surgery and Vascular.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact