John R. Pender
Impact in
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Walter J. Pories (18 shared papers)David Reed Flum (12 shared papers)Bruce M. Wolfe (13 shared papers)Anita P. Courcoulas (13 shared papers)William H. H. Chapman (13 shared papers)Wendy C. King (8 shared papers)James Earl Mitchell (9 shared papers)Saurabh G. KHANDELWAL (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases (8 papers)Obesity Surgery (7 papers)Journal of the American College of Surgeons (3 papers)The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism (2 papers)Seminars in Liver Disease (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
John R. Pender
34 papers receiving 1.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
- Pharmacy 169
- Surgery 1.2k
- Physiology 354
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 193
- Internal Medicine 35
Countries citing papers authored by John R. Pender
This map shows the geographic impact of John R. Pender's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John R. Pender with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John R. Pender more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by John R. Pender
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John R. Pender. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John R. Pender. The network helps show where John R. Pender may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside John R. Pender, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2014 | 175 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 150 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 127 | |
| 4 | 2011 | 104 | |
| 5 | 2013 | 104 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 101 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 99 | |
| 8 | 2013 | 99 | |
| 9 | 2008 | 89 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 88 | |
| 11 | 2005 | 83 | |
| 12 | 2012 | 82 | |
| 13 | 2015 | 72 | |
| 14 | 2014 | 70 | |
| 15 | 2009 | 64 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 44 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 43 | |
| 18 | 2012 | 38 | |
| 19 | 2022 | 37 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 30 |
About John R. Pender
John R. Pender is a scholar working on Surgery, Pharmacy, Physiology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Gastroenterology, having authored 38 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes (26 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (3 papers), Hernia repair and management (3 papers), Diet and metabolism studies (3 papers), Obesity and Health Practices (2 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers), Body Contouring and Surgery (2 papers) and Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacy (169 citations), Surgery (1.2k citations), Physiology (354 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (193 citations) and Internal Medicine (35 citations). John R. Pender has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Walter J. Pories, David Reed Flum, Bruce M. Wolfe, Anita P. Courcoulas, William H. H. Chapman, Wendy C. King, James Earl Mitchell, Saurabh G. KHANDELWAL, Steven H. Belle and Kristine J. Steffen. Their work appears in journals such as Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases, Obesity Surgery, Journal of the American College of Surgeons, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism and Seminars in Liver Disease.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.