Michael Bille
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 5%
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Otorhinolaryngology top 5%
- Ear Surgery and Otitis Media
Papers in
-
- Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation 9
-
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics 7
- Co-authors
- Per Cayé‐Thomasen (11 shared papers)Lisbeth Tranebjærg (3 shared papers)Stig Hebbelstrup Rye Rasmussen (2 shared papers)Agnete Parving (1 shared paper)Niels West (6 shared papers)Steen Østergaard Olsen (1 shared paper)Nanna Dahl Rendtorff (1 shared paper)Hidemi Miyazaki (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Otology & Neurotology (4 papers)International Journal of Audiology (2 papers)Scandinavian Audiology (2 papers)Journal of Clinical Medicine (2 papers)Acta Oto-Laryngologica (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- DenmarkUnited StatesNorway
In The Last Decade
Michael Bille
19 papers receiving 201 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 30
- Sensory Systems 85
- Otorhinolaryngology 45
- Cognitive Neuroscience 105
- Neurology 34
- Speech and Hearing 25
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Bille
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Bille's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Bille with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Bille more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Bille
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Bille. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Bille. The network helps show where Michael Bille may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 23 scholars most cited alongside Michael Bille, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2019 | 30 | |
| 2 | 2014 | 25 | |
| 3 | 1999 | 21 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 18 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 18 | |
| 6 | 2003 | 16 | |
| 7 | Significant regional differences in Denmark in outcome after cochlear implants in children. | 2012 | 15 |
| 8 | 2016 | 15 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2022 | 12 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 3 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 15 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 16 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 17 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 18 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 19 | [Cochlear implantation in children]. | 2018 | 1 |
About Michael Bille
Michael Bille is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Sensory Systems, Speech and Hearing, Otorhinolaryngology and Epidemiology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 207 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (9 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (7 papers), Noise Effects and Management (5 papers), Ear Surgery and Otitis Media (2 papers), Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances (1 paper), Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies (1 paper), Traumatic Brain Injury Research (1 paper) and Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (85 citations), Otorhinolaryngology (45 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (105 citations), Neurology (34 citations) and Speech and Hearing (25 citations). Michael Bille has collaborated with scholars based in Denmark, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Per Cayé‐Thomasen, Lisbeth Tranebjærg, Stig Hebbelstrup Rye Rasmussen, Agnete Parving, Niels West, Steen Østergaard Olsen, Nanna Dahl Rendtorff, Hidemi Miyazaki, Lone Percy-Smith and Mads Klokker. Their work appears in journals such as Otology & Neurotology, International Journal of Audiology, Scandinavian Audiology, Journal of Clinical Medicine and Acta Oto-Laryngologica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.