Jane S. Gordon

538 total citations
19 papers, 410 citations indexed

About

Jane S. Gordon is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience and Speech and Hearing. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane S. Gordon has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 410 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Sensory Systems, 13 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 7 papers in Speech and Hearing. Recurrent topics in Jane S. Gordon's work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (16 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (13 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (7 papers). Jane S. Gordon is often cited by papers focused on Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (16 papers), Hearing Loss and Rehabilitation (13 papers) and Noise Effects and Management (7 papers). Jane S. Gordon collaborates with scholars based in United States and Vietnam. Jane S. Gordon's co-authors include Dawn Konrad‐Martin, Wendy J. Helt, Stephen A. Fausti, Kelly M. Reavis, Gene W. Bratt, Frederick J. Gallun, Marilyn F. Dille, Donald F. Austin, David S. Phillips and Debra Wilmington and has published in prestigious journals such as Hearing Research, Ear and Hearing and The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development.

In The Last Decade

Jane S. Gordon

19 papers receiving 386 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jane S. Gordon United States 11 334 269 132 114 69 19 410
Marilyn F. Dille United States 13 397 1.2× 359 1.3× 134 1.0× 183 1.6× 71 1.0× 21 507
Wendy J. Helt United States 14 509 1.5× 431 1.6× 147 1.1× 203 1.8× 112 1.6× 23 644
Martin S. Robinette United States 9 249 0.7× 211 0.8× 129 1.0× 70 0.6× 68 1.0× 18 329
Min Young Kwak South Korea 8 104 0.3× 107 0.4× 90 0.7× 42 0.4× 48 0.7× 31 283
Filippo Mazzei Italy 9 204 0.6× 118 0.4× 158 1.2× 22 0.2× 37 0.5× 13 292
Ferda Akdaş Türkiye 10 118 0.4× 87 0.3× 38 0.3× 23 0.2× 69 1.0× 23 284
Ying Kong China 13 250 0.7× 339 1.3× 24 0.2× 130 1.1× 76 1.1× 47 426
Priyanka Reddy United States 9 54 0.2× 87 0.3× 52 0.4× 51 0.4× 37 0.5× 18 247
Nathan A. Geurkink United States 11 111 0.3× 172 0.6× 43 0.3× 37 0.3× 28 0.4× 16 348
Salwa Masud United States 6 225 0.7× 256 1.0× 73 0.6× 138 1.2× 27 0.4× 15 327

Countries citing papers authored by Jane S. Gordon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane S. Gordon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane S. Gordon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane S. Gordon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane S. Gordon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane S. Gordon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane S. Gordon. The network helps show where Jane S. Gordon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane S. Gordon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane S. Gordon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane S. Gordon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane S. Gordon. Jane S. Gordon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Lewis, Martyn, Kelly M. Reavis, Susan Griest, et al.. (2022). The influence of tinnitus and hearing loss on the functional status of military Service members and Veterans. International Journal of Audiology. 62(1). 44–52. 5 indexed citations
2.
Theodoroff, Sarah M., Frederick J. Gallun, Garnett P. McMillan, et al.. (2021). Impacts of Diabetes, Aging, and Hearing Loss on Speech-on-Speech Masking and Spatial Release in a Large Veteran Cohort. American Journal of Audiology. 30(4). 1023–1036. 1 indexed citations
3.
Gordon, Jane S., Susan Griest, Emily J. Thielman, et al.. (2016). Audiologic characteristics in a sample of recently-separated military Veterans: The Noise Outcomes in Servicemembers Epidemiology Study (NOISE Study). Hearing Research. 349. 21–30. 42 indexed citations
4.
Henry, James A., Susan Griest, Wendy J. Helt, et al.. (2016). Tinnitus Screener: Results From the First 100 Participants in an Epidemiology Study. American Journal of Audiology. 25(2). 153–160. 31 indexed citations
5.
Konrad‐Martin, Dawn, Kelly M. Reavis, Donald F. Austin, et al.. (2015). Hearing Impairment in Relation to Severity of Diabetes in a Veteran Cohort. Ear and Hearing. 36(4). 381–394. 42 indexed citations
6.
Konrad‐Martin, Dawn, Curtis J. Billings, Garnett P. McMillan, et al.. (2015). Diabetes-Associated Changes in Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials in Relation to Normal Aging. Ear and Hearing. 37(3). e173–e187. 7 indexed citations
8.
Wilmington, Debra, Dawn Konrad‐Martin, Wendy J. Helt, et al.. (2011). Ototoxicity Monitoring: Program Approaches and Considerations. Seminars in Hearing. 32(3). 248–261. 3 indexed citations
9.
Konrad‐Martin, Dawn, Kenneth E. James, Jane S. Gordon, et al.. (2010). Evaluation of Audiometric Threshold Shift Criteria for Ototoxicity Monitoring. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 21(5). 301–314. 21 indexed citations
10.
Lewis, Martyn, Frederick J. Gallun, Jane S. Gordon, David J. Lilly, & Carl C. Crandell. (2010). A Pilot Investigation Regarding Speech-Recognition Performance in Noise for Adults with Hearing Loss in the FM+HA Listening Condition. The Volta Review. 110(1). 31–54. 3 indexed citations
11.
Reavis, Kelly M., Garnett P. McMillan, Donald F. Austin, et al.. (2010). Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emission Test Performance for Ototoxicity Monitoring. Ear and Hearing. 32(1). 61–74. 59 indexed citations
12.
Dille, Marilyn F., Dawn Konrad‐Martin, Frederick J. Gallun, et al.. (2010). Tinnitus Onset Rates from Chemotherapeutic Agents and Ototoxic Antibiotics: Results of a Large Prospective Study. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 21(6). 409–417. 49 indexed citations
13.
Reavis, Kelly M., David S. Phillips, Stephen A. Fausti, et al.. (2008). Factors Affecting Sensitivity of Distortion-Product Otoacoustic Emissions to Ototoxic Hearing Loss. Ear and Hearing. 29(6). 875–893. 49 indexed citations
14.
Konrad‐Martin, Dawn, Debra Wilmington, Jane S. Gordon, Kelly M. Reavis, & Stephen A. Fausti. (2005). Audiological Management of Patients Receiving Aminoglycoside Antibiotics. The Volta Review. 105(3). 229–250. 10 indexed citations
15.
Reavis, Kelly M., et al.. (2005). Objective Measures of Ototoxicity. 9(1). 10–10. 3 indexed citations
16.
Konrad‐Martin, Dawn, Jane S. Gordon, Kelly M. Reavis, et al.. (2005). Audiological Monitoring of Patients Receiving Ototoxic Drugs. 9(1). 17–17. 23 indexed citations
17.
Konrad‐Martin, Dawn, Wendy J. Helt, Kelly M. Reavis, et al.. (2005). Ototoxicity: Early Detection and Monitoring. ASHA Leader. 10(7). 1–14. 17 indexed citations
18.
Gordon, Jane S., David S. Phillips, Wendy J. Helt, Dawn Konrad‐Martin, & Stephen A. Fausti. (2004). Evaluation of insert earphones for high-frequency bedside ototoxicity monitoring. The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development. 42(3). 353–353. 9 indexed citations
19.
Fausti, Stephen A., Wendy J. Helt, David S. Phillips, et al.. (2003). Early Detection of Ototoxicity Using 1/6th-Octave Steps. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology. 14(8). 444–450. 33 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026