M.H. Pham-Delègue
- Insect Science top 0.5%
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics top 2%
- Genetics top 5%
- Plant Science top 10%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- C. MassonJames DevillersMonique MorlotLaure KaiserJean‐Christophe DoréAxel DecourtyeJean‐Christophe SandozAude Couty
- Topics
- Insect and Pesticide Research (19 papers)Plant and animal studies (18 papers)Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (15 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited KingdomMorocco
In The Last Decade
M.H. Pham-Delègue
33 papers receiving 984 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Insect Science 837
- Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics 562
- Genetics 406
- Plant Science 229
- Molecular Biology 194
Countries citing papers authored by M.H. Pham-Delègue
This map shows the geographic impact of M.H. Pham-Delègue's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M.H. Pham-Delègue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M.H. Pham-Delègue more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M.H. Pham-Delègue
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M.H. Pham-Delègue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M.H. Pham-Delègue. The network helps show where M.H. Pham-Delègue may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M.H. Pham-Delègue
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M.H. Pham-Delègue. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M.H. Pham-Delègue based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M.H. Pham-Delègue. M.H. Pham-Delègue is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 89 | |
| 2 | 58 | |
| 3 | 34 | |
| 4 | The proboscis extension response: assessing the sublethal effects of pesticides on the honey bee. | 19 |
| 5 | 42 | |
| 6 | 59 | |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 13 | |
| 9 | 36 | |
| 10 | 32 | |
| 11 | 41 | |
| 12 | 30 | |
| 13 | 10 | |
| 14 | 20 | |
| 15 | 28 | |
| 16 | Le pollen, facteur d'attraction des pollinisateurs vers le tournesol (Helianthus annuus L.) | 2 |
| 17 | Effect of maize leaf volatiles on the oviposition preferences of Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). | 5 |
| 18 | Effect of age on the conditioned proboscis extension response in honeybees. | 2 |
| 19 | 64 | |
| 20 | 36 |
About M.H. Pham-Delègue
M.H. Pham-Delègue is a scholar working on Insect Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Genetics, having authored 33 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Insect and Pesticide Research (19 papers), Plant and animal studies (18 papers) and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Insect Science (837 citations), Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics (562 citations) and Genetics (406 citations). M.H. Pham-Delègue has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and Morocco. Frequent co-authors include C. Masson, James Devillers, Monique Morlot, Laure Kaiser, Jean‐Christophe Doré, Axel Decourtye, Jean‐Christophe Sandoz, Aude Couty, Nicolas Desneux and David Laloi. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Food Chemistry and Animal Behaviour.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.