Meredith Weiss

1.8k citations
79 papers · 798 · h-index 16

Impact in

Papers in

Meredith Weiss

74 papers receiving 695 citations

Peers

Meredith Weiss
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Political Science and International Relations 342
  • Sociology and Political Science 594
  • Gender Studies 95
  • Communication 66
  • Development 27
Replace Michael Schaller with:
Michael Schaller United States
Didier Ruedin Switzerland
Kerem Ozan Kalkan United States
Shawn Treier United States
Wenfang Tang United States
Umut Korkut United Kingdom
Alexander Kuo United States
Amy Erica Smith United States
Dingxin Zhao United States
Sabine Lang United States
Meredith Weiss relative to Michael Schaller United States Michael Schaller's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×11.5×
Michael Schaller · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meredith Weiss

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meredith Weiss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meredith Weiss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meredith Weiss more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meredith Weiss

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meredith Weiss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meredith Weiss. The network helps show where Meredith Weiss may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Meredith Weiss, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meredith Weiss Line = papers co-authored together Meredith Weiss links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 79 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Global Homophobia: States, Movements, and the Politics of Oppression
2013106
2 201444
3 200940
4 201830
5 202029
6 201426
7 200825
8
Politics in Cyberspace: New Media in Malaysia
201225
9 200024
10 200419
11 202219
12 201918
13 201318
14 201616
15 199916
16 202215
17 202014
18 200514
19 201313
20 201812

About Meredith Weiss

Meredith Weiss is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, Education, Anthropology and Communication, having authored 79 papers that have together received 798 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Asian Studies and History (53 papers), Socioeconomic Development in Asia (22 papers), Southeast Asian Sociopolitical Studies (13 papers), Asian Geopolitics and Ethnography (5 papers), Philippine History and Culture (5 papers), African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues (5 papers), Education and Islamic Studies (5 papers) and Indonesian Election Politics and Participation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (342 citations), Sociology and Political Science (594 citations), Gender Studies (95 citations), Communication (66 citations) and Development (27 citations). Meredith Weiss has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Marta Bosia, Allen Hicken, Lee Morgenbesser, Edward Aspinall, Michele Ford, Burhanuddin Muhtadi, Paul D. Hutchcroft, Gabrielle Silver, Bruce M. Greenwald and Joseph K. Wong. Their work appears in journals such as Asian Survey, Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, Democratization, Journal of Contemporary Asia and Asian Studies Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact