Meredith McQuerry

25 papers receiving 297 citations

Peers

Meredith McQuerry
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Occupational Therapy 135
  • Polymers and Plastics 105
  • Physiology 120
  • Social Psychology 91
  • Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis 42
Replace Janice Huck with:
Janice Huck United States
Chinmei Chou Taiwan
Lucy E. Dorman United Kingdom
Elizabeth M. Crown Canada
Robert J. Agnew United States
Shigeru TOMITA Japan
Anna Marszałek Poland
Jeong‐Wha Choi South Korea
Stephen A. Paskaluk Canada
Sumit Mandal United States
Meredith McQuerry relative to Janice Huck United States Janice Huck's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×20×33×
Janice Huck · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Meredith McQuerry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Meredith McQuerry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Meredith McQuerry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Meredith McQuerry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Meredith McQuerry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Meredith McQuerry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Meredith McQuerry. The network helps show where Meredith McQuerry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Meredith McQuerry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Meredith McQuerry Line = papers co-authored together Meredith McQuerry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 31 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 202061
2 201434
3 201830
4 201523
5 201921
6 201720
7 201919
8 201618
9 201614
10 201814
11 20239
12 20228
13 20227
14 20186
15 20166
16 20195
17 20195
18 20174
19 20183
20 20242

About Meredith McQuerry

Meredith McQuerry is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Social Psychology, Physiology, Polymers and Plastics and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 31 papers that have together received 317 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Occupational Health and Performance (22 papers), Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Disorders (15 papers), Thermoregulation and physiological responses (13 papers), Textile materials and evaluations (10 papers), Winter Sports Injuries and Performance (4 papers), Fire dynamics and safety research (3 papers), Climate Change and Health Impacts (3 papers) and Lower Extremity Biomechanics and Pathologies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Occupational Therapy (135 citations), Polymers and Plastics (105 citations), Physiology (120 citations), Social Psychology (91 citations) and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis (42 citations). Meredith McQuerry has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Roger Barker, Emiel DenHartog, Alex Cao, Emiel den Hartog, Huiju Park, James Tuttle, Michael J. Ormsbee, Liliana I. Rentería, Alexis Chavez and Naomi C. Brownstein. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Ergonomics, Textile Research Journal, Fire Technology, International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology and Journal of the Textile Institute.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact