Menahem Spiegel
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 10%
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
- Co-authors
- Benjamin BentalMichael J. PodolskyBenyamin ShitovitzMoshe KimSharan JagpalDavid D. HaddockFred S. McChesneyUri Ben‐Zion
- Topics
- Economic theories and models (10 papers)Merger and Competition Analysis (5 papers)Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (4 papers)
- Cited by
- General Economics, Econometrics and FinanceStrategy and ManagementEconomics and Econometrics
- Partner nations
- IsraelUnited StatesNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Menahem Spiegel
18 papers receiving 195 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 51
- Economics and Econometrics 138
- Strategy and Management 76
- Sociology and Political Science 48
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 43
- Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering 33
Countries citing papers authored by Menahem Spiegel
This map shows the geographic impact of Menahem Spiegel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Menahem Spiegel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Menahem Spiegel more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Menahem Spiegel
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Menahem Spiegel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Menahem Spiegel. The network helps show where Menahem Spiegel may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Menahem Spiegel
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Menahem Spiegel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Menahem Spiegel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Menahem Spiegel. Menahem Spiegel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 44 | |
| 10 | 72 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 4 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 35 | |
| 18 | 2 | |
| 19 | 1 |
About Menahem Spiegel
Menahem Spiegel is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Economics and Econometrics and Marketing, having authored 19 papers that have together received 235 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic theories and models (10 papers), Merger and Competition Analysis (5 papers) and Consumer Market Behavior and Pricing (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (43 citations), Strategy and Management (76 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (138 citations). Menahem Spiegel has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Benjamin Bental, Michael J. Podolsky, Benyamin Shitovitz, Moshe Kim, Sharan Jagpal, David D. Haddock, Fred S. McChesney and Uri Ben‐Zion. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business Research, Journal of Public Economics and Public Administration Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.