Melissa W. Wright

2.6k citations
52 papers · 1.4k indexed · h-index 20

Impact in

Papers in

Melissa W. Wright

45 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Melissa W. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Public Administration 110
  • Geography, Planning and Development 158
  • Urban Studies 160
  • Gender Studies 206
  • Sociology and Political Science 883
Replace Richa Nagar with:
Richa Nagar Czechia
Nina Laurie United Kingdom
Cathy McIlwaine United Kingdom
Davina Cooper United Kingdom
Beverley Mullings Canada
Anne Bonds United States
Carla Freeman United States
Bryan D. Palmer Canada
Kendra Strauss Canada
Rachel Silvey United States
Melissa W. Wright relative to Richa Nagar Czechia Richa Nagar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Richa Nagar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Melissa W. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Melissa W. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melissa W. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melissa W. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Melissa W. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melissa W. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melissa W. Wright. The network helps show where Melissa W. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Melissa W. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Melissa W. Wright Line = papers co-authored together Melissa W. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Geographies of Power: Placing Scale
2002189
2 2011171
3 2013152
4 200474
5 201071
6 199766
7 200860
8 199957
9 201755
10 200141
11 200837
12 200937
13 200131
14 199829
15 201426
16 201624
17 200523
18 200721
19 200921
20 200119

About Melissa W. Wright

Melissa W. Wright is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Political Science and International Relations, Urban Studies and Public Administration, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sex work and related issues (13 papers), Latin American and Latino Studies (10 papers), Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy (7 papers), Migration, Refugees, and Integration (5 papers), Labor Movements and Unions (5 papers), Urban Planning and Governance (4 papers), Anthropological Studies and Insights (4 papers) and Gender, Feminism, and Media (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (110 citations), Geography, Planning and Development (158 citations), Urban Studies (160 citations), Gender Studies (206 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (883 citations). Melissa W. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Slovakia. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Herod, Noel Castree, Marion Werner, Matthew Sparke, Beverley Mullings, Bradley Wilson, Kate Driscoll Derickson, Nik Heynen, Wendy Larner and Fawaz Akhras. Their work appears in journals such as Antipode, Geoforum, Environment and Planning D Society and Space, Progress in Human Geography and Environment and Planning A Economy and Space.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact