Nina Laurie

2.8k citations
64 papers · 1.6k indexed · h-index 24
Topics
Sex work and related issues (14 papers)Water Governance and Infrastructure (11 papers)Politics and Society in Latin America (7 papers)

In The Last Decade

Nina Laurie

60 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Nina Laurie
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
  • Sociology and Political Science 797
  • Political Science and International Relations 487
  • Demography 338
  • Urban Studies 212
  • Geography, Planning and Development 133
Replace Cheryl McEwan with:
Cheryl McEwan United Kingdom
Richa Nagar Czechia
Cathy McIlwaine United Kingdom
Sylvia Chant United Kingdom
Fred M. Shelley United States
Gillian Hart United States
Henk van Houtum Netherlands
Harry G. West United Kingdom
Helga Leitner United States
Marco Antonsich United Kingdom
Nina Laurie relative to Cheryl McEwan United Kingdom Cheryl McEwan's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Cheryl McEwan · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Nina Laurie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nina Laurie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nina Laurie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nina Laurie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nina Laurie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nina Laurie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nina Laurie. The network helps show where Nina Laurie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nina Laurie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nina Laurie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nina Laurie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nina Laurie. Nina Laurie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 0
3 0
4 4
5 1
6
Urarina: Identidad y memoria en la cuenca del río Chambira
1
7 3
8 10
9 29
10
Young Christians in Latin America: the experiences of young Christians who participate in faith-based international volunteering projects in Latin America
6
11 96
12 37
13 61
14
Working the spaces of neoliberalism: Activism, professionalisation and incorporation - Introduction
29
15 98
16 10
17 52
18 43
19 35
20 29

About Nina Laurie

Nina Laurie is a scholar working on Geography, Planning and Development, Anthropology and Public Administration, having authored 64 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sex work and related issues (14 papers), Water Governance and Infrastructure (11 papers) and Politics and Society in Latin America (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Urban Studies (212 citations), Demography (338 citations) and Development (91 citations). Nina Laurie has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Peru. Frequent co-authors include Matt Baillie Smith, Sarah A. Radcliffe, Wendy Larner, Robert Andolina, Simon Marvin, Liz Bondi, Diane Richardson, Alison Stenning, Cheryl McEwan and Jane Pollard. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Environmental Management, Biological Conservation and British Journal of Sociology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026