Melinda Snitow
- Molecular Biology top 5%
- Surgery top 5%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Genetics top 10%
- Biomedical Engineering top 10%
- Co-authors
- René MaehrDouglas A. MeltonDanwei HuangfuAlice E. ChenAstrid EijkelenboomWenjun GuoEdward E. MorriseyShuibing Chen
- Topics
- Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (6 papers)Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (5 papers)Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Melinda Snitow
12 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Molecular Biology 2.3k
- Surgery 1.0k
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 672
- Genetics 319
- Biomedical Engineering 288
Countries citing papers authored by Melinda Snitow
This map shows the geographic impact of Melinda Snitow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melinda Snitow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melinda Snitow more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Melinda Snitow
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melinda Snitow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melinda Snitow. The network helps show where Melinda Snitow may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Melinda Snitow
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Melinda Snitow. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Melinda Snitow based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Melinda Snitow. Melinda Snitow is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 74 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 22 | |
| 5 | 27 | |
| 6 | 193 | |
| 7 | 284 | |
| 8 | Repair and Regeneration of the Respiratory System: Complexity, Plasticity, and Mechanisms of Lung Stem Cell Functionbreakdown → | 618 |
| 9 | 44 | |
| 10 | 40 | |
| 11 | 407 | |
| 12 | 418 | |
| 13 | Induction of pluripotent stem cells by defined factors is greatly improved by small-molecule compoundsbreakdown → | 1230 |
About Melinda Snitow
Melinda Snitow is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Surgery, having authored 13 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neonatal Respiratory Health Research (6 papers), Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia Studies (5 papers) and Pluripotent Stem Cells Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (2.3k citations), Surgery (1.0k citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (672 citations). Melinda Snitow has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include René Maehr, Douglas A. Melton, Danwei Huangfu, Alice E. Chen, Astrid Eijkelenboom, Wenjun Guo, Edward E. Morrisey, Shuibing Chen, Robin Goland and Thomas Ludwig. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Nature Medicine and Nature Biotechnology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.