Mélanie Perroux
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Economics and Econometrics
- Emergency Medical Services top 10%
- Health Information Management top 10%
- Co-authors
- Damien ContandriopoulosKelley KilpatrickCarl‐Ardy DuboisIsabelle BraultMarie‐Dominique BeaulieuDanielle D’AmourArnaud DuhouxCatherine Larouche
- Topics
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes (8 papers)Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (7 papers)Nursing Roles and Practices (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesGermany
In The Last Decade
Mélanie Perroux
15 papers receiving 297 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
- General Health Professions 250
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 61
- Economics and Econometrics 56
- Emergency Medical Services 44
- Health Information Management 21
Countries citing papers authored by Mélanie Perroux
This map shows the geographic impact of Mélanie Perroux's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mélanie Perroux with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mélanie Perroux more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mélanie Perroux
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mélanie Perroux. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mélanie Perroux. The network helps show where Mélanie Perroux may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mélanie Perroux
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mélanie Perroux. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mélanie Perroux based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mélanie Perroux. Mélanie Perroux is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 16 | |
| 3 | 7 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | 22 | |
| 8 | 22 | |
| 9 | 27 | |
| 10 | 26 | |
| 11 | [Integrating nurse practitioners in primary care]. | 1 |
| 12 | 68 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 78 | |
| 15 | 19 |
About Mélanie Perroux
Mélanie Perroux is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Emergency Medical Services and Health Information Management, having authored 15 papers that have together received 312 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Primary Care and Health Outcomes (8 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (7 papers) and Nursing Roles and Practices (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Issues, ethics and legal aspects (13 citations), General Health Professions (250 citations) and Emergency Medical Services (44 citations). Mélanie Perroux has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Damien Contandriopoulos, Kelley Kilpatrick, Carl‐Ardy Dubois, Isabelle Brault, Marie‐Dominique Beaulieu, Danielle D’Amour, Arnaud Duhoux, Catherine Larouche, Astrid Brousselle and Mylaine Breton. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, BMJ Open and BMC Health Services Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.