Melanie E. M. Kelly
- Molecular Biology
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Physiology
- Ophthalmology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Steven BarnesChanjuan ShiChristine A. B. JollimoreStephen M. SimsS. Jeffrey DixonWilliam H. BaldridgeGabriel E. BertolesiMiguel Coca‐Prados
- Topics
- Ion channel regulation and function (17 papers)Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (16 papers)Retinal Development and Disorders (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesSaudi Arabia
In The Last Decade
Melanie E. M. Kelly
29 papers receiving 628 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
- Molecular Biology 484
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 273
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 75
- Physiology 66
- Ophthalmology 61
Countries citing papers authored by Melanie E. M. Kelly
This map shows the geographic impact of Melanie E. M. Kelly's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melanie E. M. Kelly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melanie E. M. Kelly more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Melanie E. M. Kelly
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melanie E. M. Kelly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melanie E. M. Kelly. The network helps show where Melanie E. M. Kelly may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Melanie E. M. Kelly
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Melanie E. M. Kelly. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Melanie E. M. Kelly based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Melanie E. M. Kelly. Melanie E. M. Kelly is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 11 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 33 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | Protein tyrosine kinase and protein phosphatase signaling pathways regulate volume-sensitive chloride currents in a nonpigmented ciliary epithelial cell line. | 41 |
| 13 | 13 | |
| 14 | 50 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 8 | |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 29 | |
| 20 | 13 |
About Melanie E. M. Kelly
Melanie E. M. Kelly is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Pharmacology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 636 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ion channel regulation and function (17 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (16 papers) and Retinal Development and Disorders (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (273 citations), Physiology (49 citations) and Sensory Systems (49 citations). Melanie E. M. Kelly has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Saudi Arabia. Frequent co-authors include Steven Barnes, Chanjuan Shi, Christine A. B. Jollimore, Stephen M. Sims, S. Jeffrey Dixon, William H. Baldridge, Gabriel E. Bertolesi, Miguel Coca‐Prados, Tessa Gordon and Peter A. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physiology, Journal of Neurophysiology and Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.