Melanie Dani
- Neurology top 2%
- Physiology top 5%
- Neurology top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 10%
- Co-authors
- Paul EdisonDavid J. BrooksPhang Boon LimRichard SuttonPatricia TaraborrelliAndreas DirksenDimitrios PanagopoulosRainer Hinz
- Topics
- Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (12 papers)Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders (9 papers)Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (7 papers)
- Cited by
- NeurologyBiological Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- United KingdomDenmarkNetherlands
In The Last Decade
Melanie Dani
42 papers receiving 1.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Neurology 616
- Physiology 408
- Neurology 361
- Psychiatry and Mental health 256
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 230
Countries citing papers authored by Melanie Dani
This map shows the geographic impact of Melanie Dani's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melanie Dani with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melanie Dani more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Melanie Dani
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melanie Dani. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melanie Dani. The network helps show where Melanie Dani may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Melanie Dani
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Melanie Dani. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Melanie Dani based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Melanie Dani. Melanie Dani is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 27 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 66 | |
| 8 | 18 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 8 | |
| 13 | 31 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | Autonomic dysfunction in ‘long COVID’: rationale, physiology and management strategiesbreakdown → | 462 |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 22 | |
| 18 | 34 | |
| 19 | 19 | |
| 20 | 0 |
About Melanie Dani
Melanie Dani is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Neurology and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, having authored 46 papers that have together received 1.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (12 papers), Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders (9 papers) and Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (361 citations), Neurology (616 citations) and Biological Psychiatry (90 citations). Melanie Dani has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Paul Edison, David J. Brooks, Phang Boon Lim, Richard Sutton, Patricia Taraborrelli, Andreas Dirksen, Dimitrios Panagopoulos, Rainer Hinz, Melanie Wood and Zhen Fan. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Brain and Neurology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.