Melanee Thomas

610 citations
18 papers · 338 · h-index 10

Impact in

Papers in

Melanee Thomas

17 papers receiving 328 citations

Peers

Melanee Thomas
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Gender Studies 192
  • Political Science and International Relations 163
  • General Energy 4
  • Communication 27
  • Public Administration 11
Replace Seiki Tanaka with:
Seiki Tanaka Netherlands
Alexandra Cirone United States
Lori Thorlakson Canada
Gabriele Abels Germany
Conor Little Ireland
Nikhar Gaikwad United States
Katja Freistein Germany
Clara Volintiru Romania
Zach Warner United States
Isabelle Guinaudeau France
Melanee Thomas relative to Seiki Tanaka Netherlands Seiki Tanaka's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×14×
Seiki Tanaka · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Melanee Thomas

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Melanee Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Melanee Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Melanee Thomas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Melanee Thomas

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Melanee Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Melanee Thomas. The network helps show where Melanee Thomas may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 12 scholars most cited alongside Melanee Thomas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Melanee Thomas Line = papers co-authored together Melanee Thomas links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 201280
2 202264
3 200841
4 201638
5 201229
6 201814
7 202114
8 202014
9 202110
10 20219
11 20236
12 20196
13 20215
14
Barriers to Women's Political Participation in Canada
20133
15 20212
16 20242
17
The Efficacy Enigma: Explaining the Gender Gap in Internal Political Efficacy in Canada and the United States
20151
18
Moms in Politics: Work Is Work
20170

About Melanee Thomas

Melanee Thomas is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 338 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Politics and Representation (12 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (7 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (4 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (3 papers), Political Influence and Corporate Strategies (2 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (2 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers) and Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (192 citations), Political Science and International Relations (163 citations), General Energy (4 citations), Communication (27 citations) and Public Administration (11 citations). Melanee Thomas has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marc André Bodet, Lori Thorlakson, Elisabeth Gidengil, Allison Harell, Erin Tolley, Scott Pruysers, Julie Blais, Christian Schimpf, Brenda O’Neill and Amanda Bittner. Their work appears in journals such as Canadian Journal of Political Science, Electoral Studies, PS Political Science & Politics, Political Behavior and European Journal of Politics and Gender.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact