Brenda O’Neill
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Communication top 10%
- Strategy and Management
- Co-authors
- Joanna EverittLisa YoungDavid StewartElisabeth GidengilLynda EricksonScott PruysersLindsay McLarenMartín Papillon
- Topics
- Gender Politics and Representation (10 papers)Electoral Systems and Political Participation (7 papers)Social Media and Politics (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaIrelandSouth Korea
In The Last Decade
Brenda O’Neill
18 papers receiving 257 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Political Science and International Relations 169
- Gender Studies 135
- Sociology and Political Science 111
- Communication 46
- Strategy and Management 23
Countries citing papers authored by Brenda O’Neill
This map shows the geographic impact of Brenda O’Neill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brenda O’Neill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brenda O’Neill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brenda O’Neill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brenda O’Neill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brenda O’Neill. The network helps show where Brenda O’Neill may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brenda O’Neill
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brenda O’Neill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brenda O’Neill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brenda O’Neill. Brenda O’Neill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 12 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | Unpacking Gender's Role in Political Representation in Canada | 6 |
| 7 | 26 | |
| 8 | 3 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | 8 | |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | Democracy in Crisis | 0 |
| 16 | Evaluating Traditionalism in the Atlantic Provinces: Voting, Public Opinion and the Electoral Project | 3 |
| 17 | Citizen politics : research and theory in Canadian political behaviour | 58 |
| 18 | 33 | |
| 19 | 15 | |
| 20 | The relevance of leader gender to voting in the 1993 Canadian national election | 11 |
About Brenda O’Neill
Brenda O’Neill is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Public Administration and Political Science and International Relations, having authored 21 papers that have together received 274 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender Politics and Representation (10 papers), Electoral Systems and Political Participation (7 papers) and Social Media and Politics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (135 citations), Political Science and International Relations (169 citations) and Communication (46 citations). Brenda O’Neill has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Ireland and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Joanna Everitt, Lisa Young, David Stewart, Elisabeth Gidengil, Lynda Erickson, Scott Pruysers, Lindsay McLaren, Martín Papillon, Graham White and Alex Marland. Their work appears in journals such as Ethnic and Racial Studies, Political Studies and Party Politics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.