Mel Steer

492 total citations
8 papers, 327 citations indexed

About

Mel Steer is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Education and Conservation. According to data from OpenAlex, Mel Steer has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 327 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in General Health Professions, 4 papers in Education and 3 papers in Conservation. Recurrent topics in Mel Steer's work include Art Therapy and Mental Health (3 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (2 papers) and Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (2 papers). Mel Steer is often cited by papers focused on Art Therapy and Mental Health (3 papers), Chronic Disease Management Strategies (2 papers) and Occupational Therapy Practice and Research (2 papers). Mel Steer collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom. Mel Steer's co-authors include Suzanne Moffatt, Linda Penn, Nicola O’Brien, Sarah Lawson, Josephine M. Wildman, Paul Biddle, Wendy Dyer, Eugene Milne, Luke Vale and Frauke Becker and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and PLoS ONE.

In The Last Decade

Mel Steer

6 papers receiving 320 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Mel Steer United Kingdom	5	226	163	133	101	45	8	327
Julia Vera Pescheny United Kingdom	6	267 1.2×	182 1.1×	143 1.1×	118 1.2×	71 1.6×	9	375
Patrick Hutt United Kingdom	6	171 0.8×	133 0.8×	100 0.8×	78 0.8×	45 1.0×	14	283
Tamsin Thomas Australia	12	47 0.2×	197 1.2×	26 0.2×	33 0.3×	17 0.4×	18	330
Elaine Moody Canada	9	39 0.2×	168 1.0×	9 0.1×	10 0.1×	35 0.8×	41	302
Mary Morley United Kingdom	11	8 0.0×	118 0.7×	161 1.2×	24 0.2×	27 0.6×	34	272
Tim Heffernan Australia	10	20 0.1×	189 1.2×	11 0.1×	21 0.2×	125 2.8×	17	298
Sarah Kantartzis United Kingdom	10	5 0.0×	83 0.5×	210 1.6×	21 0.2×	10 0.2×	25	293
Katherine Gill Australia	11	7 0.0×	170 1.0×	16 0.1×	23 0.2×	26 0.6×	22	293
Katarzyna Olcoń Australia	9	12 0.1×	90 0.6×	5 0.0×	39 0.4×	54 1.2×	32	251
Nicholas Pollard United Kingdom	7	4 0.0×	87 0.5×	326 2.5×	25 0.2×	13 0.3×	12	417

Countries citing papers authored by Mel Steer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mel Steer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mel Steer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mel Steer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mel Steer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mel Steer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mel Steer. The network helps show where Mel Steer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mel Steer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mel Steer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mel Steer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mel Steer. Mel Steer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

8 of 8 papers shown

Haighton, Catherine, et al.. (2024). Domiciliary Carers’ Perspectives on Alcohol Use by Older Adults in Their Care: A Systematic Review and Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Studies. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 21(10). 1324–1324.

McMeekin, Peter, et al.. (2023). Developing and piloting an intervention to reduce colposcopy non-attendance and corresponding inequalities: a mixed-methods study. The Lancet. 402. S35–S35.

Howel, Denise, Suzanne Moffatt, Catherine Haighton, et al.. (2019). Does domiciliary welfare rights advice improve health-related quality of life in independent-living, socio-economically disadvantaged people aged ≥60 years? Randomised controlled trial, economic and process evaluations in the North East of England. PLoS ONE. 14(1). e0209560–e0209560. 11 indexed citations

Wildman, Josephine M., et al.. (2019). Service-users’ perspectives of link worker social prescribing: a qualitative follow-up study. BMC Public Health. 19(1). 98–98. 78 indexed citations

Wildman, Josephine M., et al.. (2019). Link workers’ perspectives on factors enabling and preventing client engagement with social prescribing. Health & Social Care in the Community. 27(4). 991–998. 58 indexed citations

Haighton, Catherine, Suzanne Moffatt, Denise Howel, et al.. (2019). Randomised controlled trial with economic and process evaluations of domiciliary welfare rights advice for socioeconomically disadvantaged older people recruited via primary health care (the Do-Well study). SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(3). 1–228. 2 indexed citations

Moffatt, Suzanne, Mel Steer, Sarah Lawson, Linda Penn, & Nicola O’Brien. (2017). Link Worker social prescribing to improve health and well-being for people with long-term conditions: qualitative study of service user perceptions. BMJ Open. 7(7). e015203–e015203. 147 indexed citations

Dyer, Wendy, Mel Steer, & Paul Biddle. (2015). Mental Health Street Triage. Policing A Journal of Policy and Practice. 9(4). 377–387. 31 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact